Tuesday, November 7, 2017

Today by Sean Kelly

An unlikely crisis
What could Turnbull have done, really?

Today was the last day to vote in the same-sex postal survey. Courtesy ABS Source

Does anyone else out there feel just a tiny bit uneasy about the fact a government could fall because some MPs didn’t fill out some nomination forms correctly?

Now, I know it’s more complicated than that. And I know what some of you would say: we’re talking about the Constitution here, and that matters. Also, that MPs routinely expect other people to meet stupid requirements (Centrelink applicants are repeatedly raised), so surely there’s hypocrisy here. There’s also the argument about national security, that only people with clear allegiance only to Australia should have access to the type of information MPs do.

I buy all of those arguments to some extent, but also … not that much. Yes, the MPs were lazy and reckless and should have filled in their forms and stuck to the Constitution; also, it’s arguable that the Constitution is outdated. Hypocrisy, tick, but enough to bring down a government? And on national security, some other countries get by just fine with dual citizens in their parliament.

Anyway, I acknowledge these are points on which reasonable people can differ. It’s just that when it gets to a whole government changing, it all feels a little overblown.

Thinking this over, I began to wonder what Malcolm Turnbull should have done. Given where this has all ended, the answer seems obvious. Right at the outset, as doubts began to emerge about various MPs, he should have put in place the process he did yesterday. He could have said that this was important, yes, but essentially it was an administrative issue that needed to be dealt with, and which would likely affect a range of MPs from different parties. That would have been preferable to what has happened. It would have made the problem seem bureaucratic in nature. It would have avoided the multiple embarrassments the prime minister has suffered: falsely declaring the High Court “will so hold”, losing the court case itself, the Lib-Nats blame game, the emergence, not long after the PM put in place the new declaration process, of yet another government MP in potential difficulty.

But that’s with the wisdom of hindsight. Turnbull couldn’t know things would go as badly as they have done. And if he had acted early, and that had led to byelections, he would have been monstered by his enemies in the Liberal Party for exposing them to the risk of losing government. Sometimes, governments have to wait until the pressure seems almost intolerable to get away with acting; act earlier and they can be accused of jumping the gun.

If you wanted to add to the ledger against Turnbull, you’d make the point that all of this wouldn’t be so bad if it wasn’t for the political context he’s done so much to create. Byelections stretching into next year wouldn’t matter so much if 2017 hadn’t been as bad as it has been. Acting at the last possible moment on citizenship disclosures wouldn’t seem so messy if acting at the last possible moment hadn’t become the house style.

To that, Turnbull could fairly say these problems have been forced on him by a party that refuses to function properly. He could add that, with a one-seat majority, byelections right now would be dangerous whatever the government’s current political standing. To which his opponents could reply: yes, but byelections wouldn’t matter so much if we had more than a one-seat majority, and that’s on you.

You could go back and forth on this stuff forever. If the government does end up collapsing it may not be entirely sensible, or fair, that it happens in this manner. But politics is rarely fair, and often brutal. The beginning of a chain of events, in politics or elsewhere, may later seem absurd: that World War I could unfold from the shooting of Archduke Franz Ferdinand is only the most famous example. How we got here is no longer that important.

The filter of history works in many ways. Right now the citizenship mess seems a major crisis. If Turnbull finds his way through, and emerges into a successful 2018, it will all seem like so much dust. That seems highly unlikely. But then politics is full of unlikely events.


In other news


In light of recent events

Five stages of defeat after believing you were a shoo-in

Oslo Davis

For pure entertainment, nothing beats looking at the miserable faces of sports players after they’ve lost a match. Give me the crushed, vacant expressions of the vanquished over the victors’ sickly sweet grins any time. It's not because I like people to lose, per se. Rather, I’m mesmerised by the drama of how the losing is expressed, how the face seems to catastrophically implode when enthusiasm and strength are suddenly sucked out of it.” read on


The stopover

The prospect of 12 hours in Singapore airport gives rise to an existential crisis

Robert Skinner

“In an airport you can be anyone: no one knows your story; they only know you’re going somewhere. It helps if you dress for the occasion. At 8.55 am I strode into the terminal with the feeling that I had my whole life ahead of me, probably because I hadn’t done anything with it yet. But I was doing my best impersonation of a jetsetter: polished sneakers, my cleanest shirt and a hat from a hotel’s lost property.” (April 2017) READ ON

Sean Kelly

Sean Kelly is a columnist for The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age, and was an adviser to Labor prime ministers Julia Gillard and Kevin Rudd.



The Monthly Today

Composite image of NSW Premier Dominic Perrottet and Prime Minister Scott Morrison (images via ABC News)

Border farce

So much for the national plan

Image of Nationals deputy leader David Littleproud, leader Barnaby Joyce and leader in the Senate Bridget McKenzie, June 21, 2021. Image © Lukas Coch / AAP Image

Fear and showboating

The Nationals are worried about a net-zero backlash of their own making

Composite image of Nationals Senate leader Bridget McKenzie (via ABC News) and News Corp presenter Andrew Bolt (via Sky News)

The little guys

A vocal minority that has for so long controlled the climate debate is now painting itself as marginalised

Image of federal Labor MP Anthony Byrne, July 30, 2019. Image © Mick Tsikas / AAP Image

A tale of two commissions

Support for anti-corruption initiatives shouldn’t rest on which side of politics is under investigation

From the front page

Composite image of NSW Premier Dominic Perrottet and Prime Minister Scott Morrison (images via ABC News)

Border farce

So much for the national plan

Image of a tampon and a sanitary pad viewed from above

A bloody shame: Paid period leave should be law

Australia’s workplace laws must better accommodate the reproductive body

Image of Gladys Berejiklian appearing before an ICAC hearing in October 2020. Image via ABC News

The cult of Gladys Berejiklian

What explains the hero-worship of the former NSW premier?

Cover image of ‘Bodies of Light’

‘Bodies of Light’ by Jennifer Down

The Australian author’s latest novel, dissecting trauma, fails to realise its epic ambitions