
Holgate strikes back
Scott Morrison humiliated the wrong womanMonday, March 22, 2021
A cover up of a cover up
Who knew that the “who knew what, and when” inquiry had been paused, and when?
Phil Gaetjens, the secretary of the Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet, speaking in a Senate estimates hearing today. Image via Sky News
The Morrison government has for weeks used the lack of a police investigation into the rape allegations against Attorney-General Christian Porter as an excuse not to hold an independent inquiry or answer questions. But now the inverse reason is being used to justify the government’s actions in relation to the rape allegations made by former Liberal staffer Brittany Higgins: the existence of a police investigation is the excuse used to shut down inquiries and questions. Many are crying “cover up”, after it came to light in a Senate estimates hearing that the investigation into who in the PM’s office knew what and when about Higgins’ alleged rape was suspended on March 9. Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet secretary Phil Gaetjens stated that he had paused his investigation on the advice of the AFP, while AFP commissioner Reece Kershaw earlier told a different committee that he had raised concerns about overlap with the police investigation, but had not made any requests of Gaetjens to amend or pause his inquiry (Kershaw has since released a statement saying he “informed Mr Gaetjens on 9 March it was strongly advisable to hold off”, and that he supported the decision to put the internal inquiry on hold). Gaetjens revealed he had never spoken with Higgins, yet insisted he was acting to protect her, prompting outrage from senators in the room.
Earlier in the day, a hearing had to be put on hold after Senate President Scott Ryan (one of the few people confirmed to have known about the alleged rape at the time) refused to answer questions about the allegations, pointing to the ongoing police investigation, while Department of Parliamentary Services secretary Rob Stefanic said he had to be “very cautious about answering any detail”, though admitted that police had not advised him not to answer.
Labor and Greens senators were exasperated by the stonewalling in Senate estimates, but plenty of outrage was reserved for Prime Minister Scott Morrison, who somehow failed to mention that Gaetjens’ inquiry had been suspended – despite being repeatedly asked about it in parliament over the past week (Gaetjens confirmed that he had told the prime minister of the pause directly on March 9). As recently as last Thursday, Morrison told the House of Representatives that he could not speak to who knew what and when, with inquiries into the matter being made by the secretary “at arm’s length from me”. When asked why the Gaetjens report was taking so long, he repeated that, saying he had “no involvement in that process, and nor should I”.
Today’s Question Time was, unsurprisingly, dominated by the revelations, with Opposition Leader Anthony Albanese demanding to know why the prime minister had misled the parliament on the status of the Gaetjens inquiry. Morrison insisted he did “no such thing”, going further in challenging Albanese to pursue other avenues if he believed this to be the case (Albanese moved to suspend standing orders to do just that, and was immediately shut down by Acting Leader of the House Peter Dutton). Shadow attorney-general Mark Dreyfus asked the prime minister why he had misled the House on the Porter briefing, following evidence from the AFP commissioner that he had not provided the PM with details, to which Morrison replied that he could “only recall faithfully to the House what occurred”, insisting he had done so. Labor MP Catherine King continued her persistent questioning over whether the PM’s staff had backgrounded against Higgins’ loved ones, following further estimates revelations that the department of PMC received a media enquiry about Higgins’ partner on February 17 – questions Morrison once again deflected.
While dodging multiple questions regarding why he misled the parliament over the Gaetjens inquiry, Morrison rebuked Albanese for making this a “personal attack”. This issue certainly did become more personal for the prime minister today. It’s clear from last week’s on-the-record answers – which many were quick to pull up – that he intentionally failed to mention that the inquiry was on hold, intensifying speculation over what has been covered up here. As Albanese demanded to know near the end of Question Time, “why is it the prime minister doesn’t hold an inquiry and won’t answer a question?” That’s something we’d all like to know – perhaps tonight’s episode of Four Corners, entitled “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell”, will be able to shed some light on the matter.
|
Holgate strikes back
Scott Morrison humiliated the wrong womanThe cost of delay
Delays, as we have sadly learnt, can mean the difference between life and deathVaccine rollout a (p)fizzer
The government came with good news, but the rollout remains a shamblesTrust fall
Supply issues aren’t the only thing hampering the vaccine rolloutThe lightness of unbearable being: ‘Double Blind’
Edward St Aubyn tackles familiar themes – desire, drug use, psychoanalysis – via a fresh suite of charactersHolgate strikes back
Scott Morrison humiliated the wrong womanUp the river
Hope is running dry in the Murray–Darling BasinGreen house effect
Joost Bakker’s vision for sustainable housing is taking root
Comments
Comments are moderated and will generally be posted if they are on topic and not abusive. View the full comments policy .