
ScoMo’s so-and-so
Morrison’s self-appointments may have strengthened the case for a republic, while discrediting arguments against a voice to parliamentFrom left: NSW Premier Gladys Berejiklian (image via Facebook), Prime Minister Scott Morrison (image via Facebook), Health Minister Greg Hunt (Image © Luis Ascui / AAP Image)
A number of incidents during this scandal-plagued week have been described – euphemistically – as “not a good look” for the Coalition. First there was Scott Morrison’s secret Father’s Day trip to Sydney, which ACT Chief Minister Andrew Barr described as “not a particularly good look” when pressed on the issue (a sentiment echoed by The Canberra Times). Then there were the FOI-released Pfizer emails, which Australian columnist Peter Van Onselen told RN Breakfast were “not a good look, at the absolute least”. Next came revelations the Morrison government had pressured the UK into dropping key climate goals from its trade negotiations, something The Canberra Times again thought was “not a good look”, especially ahead of the Glasgow climate summit. The decision to quietly appoint former WA Liberal Women’s Council president (and questioner of affirmative consent laws) Lorraine Finlay as the Australian Human Rights Commissioner, on the eve of the women’s safety summit, raised eyebrows, with Australian of the Year Grace Tame describing it as a “grave mistake”, and Morrison’s decision to take the opening keynote speech at the summit certainly didn’t go down well. Then there is the little matter of the JobKeeper overpayments and the objection to transparency measures, which Nine columnist (and former Liberal adviser) Niki Savva says is inexcusable and comes across much worse than the government seems to realise. Today, the NSW Coalition made a move with one of the most appalling looks yet, or what it perhaps hopes will soon be the absence of looks: Premier Gladys Berejiklian’s announcement that she would be stopping her daily COVID-19 press conferences from Monday, even though cases are expected to peak in the coming weeks and concerns are swirling about the impact on the healthcare system. Berejiklian has justified the decision by emphasising the need to start living with COVID. But the move has been slammed as shamefully early, with journalists and punters alike describing it as going into “hiding” at a critical time. Doesn’t the Coalition understand the optics of anything?
Berejiklian’s announcement – that she and the health minister will no longer front up to the media every day, instead only appearing “intermittently”, with NSW Health to publish daily videos – has been met with exasperation and disbelief in light of the fact the state is staring down the most challenging period of the pandemic yet (and that’s according to the reopening cheerleaders at the Australian Financial Review). The decision has been widely interpreted as an attempt to dodge scrutiny (former Insiders host Barrie Cassidy suggested this would become a future case study for the shirking of government accountability), while journalists and commentators are horrified at the implications for transparency and democracy. The first question at today’s press conference accused Berejiklian of “going into hiding”, to which the premier retorted that answering questions every day was preventing her from doing her job properly – as if answering questions at a critical point in the outbreak wasn’t part of her job. (The priorities of the state’s reopening, notes Australia Institute economist Alison Pennington, are themselves not such a crash-hot look.) Berejiklian insisted, reasonably, that the daily press conferences can’t go on indefinitely. But the idea that now is the time to stop them, just as the state is about to embark on the nation’s first foray into “living with COVID”, is simply laughable.
The NSW premier has never been particularly forthcoming with information in her daily press conferences: she is prone to serving up word salad and proficient at turning direct questions into a chance to opine on any topic of her choosing. She has refused to share “worst-case scenario” modelling, claiming she can’t recall it or that it’s subject to change (and therefore unable to be shared). This latest announcement, however, presents a new low in NSW state government accountability with its implication that journalists will no longer be given a regular opportunity to ask her or health officials direct questions at all. Berejiklian may be hoping that in avoiding these public appearances she can avoid being associated with the more negative elements of a reopening strategy that experts have labelled “extremely risky”: the hospital system is about to experience unprecedented pressure, and many people are expected to die. But the implications for her will be even worse if she hides away during the crisis. Just ask Scott Morrison.
The federal government has faced a number of crises of its own this week, many of which were made far worse than they needed to be by the secrecy that surrounded them. Morrison’s VIP flight to Sydney was made much worse by the stupefying decision to post to social media a (very questionable) photo implying he was separated from his family, while the debate over the unfair distribution of Pfizer between states could have been cleared up very quickly if the government was more forthcoming with its data. The health minister insists there is more to the story of the 2020 Pfizer email chain than “Labor’s” documents are letting on, insisting there is other correspondence that wasn’t released – so why not just release it himself? Some were surprised to see the PM front the media yesterday in light of Hunt’s scandal, especially after his long absences in June and July. For now, it seems, Morrison appears to have learnt that it’s better to show up – and at least pretend to answer some questions – than to stay hidden away. He also appears to have learnt a major lesson from his weekend sojourn to Sydney: a spokesperson for his office has just announced that he has again returned to Sydney, where he will work “under NSW’s stay-at-home conditions”, before returning to Canberra next week using the ACT exemption. Perhaps Berejiklian could also learn something from Morrison’s big lesson of the week: the cover-up often looks worse than the crime.
|
ScoMo’s so-and-so
Morrison’s self-appointments may have strengthened the case for a republic, while discrediting arguments against a voice to parliamentThe eagle has ranted
Scott Morrison digs in, and the party that enabled his actions stands by himWorking prime to five
Scott Morrison would have us believe that he forgot he gave himself power over Treasury and Home AffairsThe cabinet of Scott’s grandiosity
What could explain Morrison’s self-appointments other than a pathological penchant for power and secrecy?The mess around: ‘Clean’
Lachlan McLeod’s absorbing documentary about trauma cleaner Sandra Pankhurst considers how traumatic experiences leave their markAdjust your expectations: ‘Indian Matchmaking’
While it’s refreshing compared to other reality dating shows, the second season following matchmaker Sima from Mumbai and her clients is less satisfying than the first‘Losing Face’
George Haddad’s latest novel surveys the confronting world of male interiorityLine call on Spring Creek
Development hits a roadblock in the regional town of Torquay