NSW Premier Gladys Berejiklian is digging her government deeper and deeper into a hole as she attempts to defend the indefensible, insisting that she has done nothing wrong and never would. If only getting oneself off the hook was so easy. Berejiklian might have been a reasonably good premier, but winning a single election and being well liked doesn’t mean she is above reproach, much less above the law. Berejiklian’s defence doesn’t even make sense: today she told reporters that her secret partner (until recently), the corrupt former Wagga Wagga MP Daryl Maguire, did not benefit from his relationship with her. To the contrary, all the evidence we’ve seen at ICAC hearings to date suggests that his relationship with the premier was Maguire’s stock-in-trade! What’s more, according to one report today, it may be that Berejiklian has already misled ICAC. The premier was intimately familiar with Maguire’s flagrantly corrupt activities (when told of one deal, she texted back: “woo hoo!”), but did nothing. When NSW Labor leader Jodi McKay asked Berejiklian about that in Question Time today, the premier tried to turn the tables by asking what McKay had done while she was sitting on government benches alongside corrupt former Labor powerbroker Eddie Obeid. In what could prove a turning point in NSW politics, McKay actually had a good answer: “Unlike you, I reported it to ICAC!”

Two no-confidence motions against Berejiklian were adjourned today, so the premier limps on for now, but Maguire’s ICAC evidence has not yet finished being heard, let alone a report handed down, let alone a trial that could surely put him in jail. This scandal has years to run and, if she survives, will dog Berejiklian all the way to the next election. Probably beyond. 

Maguire’s evidence at ICAC today was stunning. He basically admitted he monetised his position as an MP, particularly in promoting his fraudulent Chinese cash-for-visas scheme. (And one wonders whether the thoroughly apolitical Australian Federal Police might have done anything about that, given it had no problem raiding the office of Labor MP Shaoquett Moselmane, destroying his parliamentary career, and then declaring he was no longer of interest.) But today the main game is not Maguire’s corrupt shenanigans – he is done for – it’s the premier herself. When he was asked if he had ever taken a fee in exchange for introducing someone to another MP or the premier, Maguire said he hadn’t because “that would be going too far”. The Australian’s Caroline Overington says that means “he never pimped out Gladys”, but it’s too early to judge.

The depth of Berejiklian’s five-year relationship with Maguire means there is a hell of a lot for journalists to pick over in the coming days, weeks, months and years. One such example is this story from the ABC’s Conor Duffy, which reveals that Berejiklian attended a meeting as treasurer with Maguire about a major local transport project that received funding despite opposition from the roads minister. As Guardian Australia reports, then Opposition leader Luke Foley questioned Berejiklian in parliament in 2018 on why she had retained Maguire as a parliamentary secretary “even after he arranged for her to meet convicted criminals Gino Scutti and Nicholas Tinning”. Now we know. 

Former ICAC commissioner Anthony Whealy QC, head of the Centre for Public Integrity and a staunch advocate of a federal anti-corruption watchdog, told the ABC today that he would not rush to judgement ahead of any finding of corrupt conduct against the premier, especially given she has been so well regarded, and that she should not stand down. “She stood by her man,” said Whealy. Which is true: she stood by a corrupt politician, and did nothing. For that reason alone, she should go. 

But there’s more bad news for Berejiklian, with the state’s upper house having its own no-confidence debate this afternoon, and key crossbenchers vowing not to pass government legislation unless she steps aside. The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers Party leader Robert Borsak said: “We have lost all confidence in her, and we call on her colleagues to tap her on the shoulder and ask her to stand aside.” It’s terminal.

---

GOOD OPINION Held to ransom “What we’ve heard, in a nutshell, is that Aboriginal people don’t want to be held to ransom for the use of something that has been a symbol of pride and activism over decades.” RN Breakfast NT Labor senator Malarndirri McCarthy, chair of a Senate inquiry on the Aboriginal flag, explains why the inquiry recommended against the government compulsorily acquiring the privately owned symbol. BAD OPINION Stage three “In terms of the tax policies we take to the election, we will determine those between now and the next election. I don’t personally feel we need to rush into a decision on tax cuts which don’t come into effect for four years.” Read on Shadow treasurer Jim Chalmers tells the National Press Club that Labor does not yet have a position on repealing the legislated stage-three tax cuts, which will remove the 32.5 per cent tax bracket altogether in 2024. James Packer shows his hand Over the past few weeks, an inquiry into Crown Resorts, Australia’s largest gambling company, has laid bare a culture of risk taking and threats. It’s also embroiled one of the company’s biggest shareholders. Mike Seccombe on James Packer’s extraordinary evidence, and what’s at stake for Crown. LISTEN NOW The Number >50% The drop in the number of small, medium and large corals across the Great Barrier Reef between 1996 and 2017. Nine Media The Policy Restart attack “The federal government has spent less than half what it planned to help older Australians into work and more than 40% of those receiving wage subsidies were out of a job within three months. Only $254m has been spent to help 51,190 mature-age people into work, despite the Coalition promising in 2014 to spend $520m to help up to 32,000 older Australians find a job every year.” Guardian Australia Employment department figures show that the Restart program, which provides $10,000 wage subsidies for workers over 50 who are unemployed for six months or more, is heavily underspent. The list   Arts & Letters Body politic: ‘Boys State’ “How did it get like this? What happened to the US? Once the self-styled model of modern democracy, it’s now beginning to resemble a failed state, so riven by partisan beliefs that even hard data and empirical evidence routinely fail to convince one third of its population. Boys State (Apple TV), the new documentary from Jesse Moss and Amanda McBaine, doesn’t have any concrete answers, but aims to shine a light upon the origins of the problem.” The Monthly Film Cocktail hour: ‘On the Rocks’ “Social media has so ruinously overexposed the legend of ‘Bill Murray’ that it’s easy to forget how compelling he can be, and how Coppola, who all but minted his so-called late-career ‘prestige’ with Lost in Translation, is able to mine the full scope of his complicated appeal. She pushes him to explore new shapes … and, in turn, he nudges her outside the comfort zone of her sometimes hermetic universes; they’re in perfect symbiosis, like a real-life dad and daughter goofing on the town.” The Monthly News Why Australia runs out of vital medicines “Australia imports more than 90 per cent of its medicines and sits at the end of long and complex pharmaceutical supply chains. While the COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted how this puts our safety at risk, it is not a new problem … Significantly, in the time of COVID-19, Australia’s vaccine manufacturing capacity is less than it was a decade ago. And despite the new-found interest in boosting Australian manufacturing, the details released in the budget package are sparse. So far, there is little sign the government has a strategic plan to tackle the problems.” The Saturday Paper