Monday, August 5, 2019

Today by Paddy Manning


US vs China
Australia needs to assert its independence from the US, not fall into line

Source

Both the government and Opposition cling to the idea that Australia doesn’t have to choose between the United States and China, but the proposition is getting harder to maintain as the two nations seem set for collision. “For Australia it’s not a matter of choice between the United States or China,” Defence Minister Linda Reynolds told RN Breakfast this morning, explaining that “when it comes to China we have a strong and longstanding relationship, and with the United States they remain our strongest ally”. But The Australian’s editor-at-large Paul Kelly writes [$], “Anybody who thinks Australia did not long ago take sides and continues to take sides on a daily basis in the US–China strategic rivalry lives in dreamland.”

Speaking in Kalgoorlie, former prime minister John Howard called the protests in Hong Kong “inspirational” and said Australia should favour the US over increasingly authoritarian China, rather than be mesmerised by the economic importance of the trading relationship. It seems Australia is being softened up for some kind of US–China confrontation, and the possibility that American conventional ground-based mid-range missiles could be located [$] on our soil – as US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo flagged during AUSMIN talks over the weekend – comes as a wake-up call as to what the US might shortly expect as part of our so-called alliance dues. This morning, Reynolds sounded relieved that her brand-new US counterpart, Defense Secretary Mark Esper, had “confirmed that there was no ask of Australia, and that none was expected”. Likewise, shadow foreign affairs minister Penny Wong told Sky News: “I don’t want to get into a hypothetical discussion about something that is – as I understand from the government’s statement, and that’s consistent with the discussions we had with the defence secretary – something that is not currently on the table.”

Australia needs to do more than cross its fingers and hope a request to host US missiles doesn’t arrive: we need an independent foreign and defence policy. We are being pushed towards a confrontation with our biggest trading partner by a militaristic ally that, by embracing white nationalism, protectionism and climate vandalism, is acting directly against our economic and strategic interests in this region. Already the flash points are multiplying at a frightening rate: from the South China Sea to Hong Kong, from North Korea to Taiwan, and via the rollout of a digital iron curtain exemplified by the Huawei bans. The Australia–China relationship itself is under enormous strain given the ongoing domestic debate over foreign influence, and upcoming criminal and anti-corruption inquiries including into the Crown saga and the detention of writer Yang Hengjun [$]. Adding to this pressure is the treatment of Uyghurs in China’s west, and calls for the re-nationalisation of Darwin Port, which South Australian Labor MP Nick Champion put on the table today.

All this needs careful diplomacy, not sabre-rattling. Asked whether Canberra would be unwise to support Washington in a confrontation with China that America probably cannot win, Mike Pompeo said: “Look, you can sell your soul for a pile of soy beans or you can protect your people. Our mission is to do both. We think it’s possible to achieve both of those outcomes.”

It is inflammatory, un-statesmanlike language that is the opposite of reassuring. 


“Before this happened I was afraid of death, but Mum was incredibly brave, and the way she died gave me a whole new perspective on death itself but also the right to have an empowered death. It’s about human suffering, and ending that suffering.”

Nicole Robertson, talking to ABC Melbourne’s Jon Faine about the death of her mother, Kerry, the first person to use Victoria’s Voluntary Assisted Dying Act.

“This newspaper, derided by the Left for almost two decades for publishing so-called climate deniers, did not just stumble on the writing of Bjorn Lomborg, Ian Plimer, the late Bob Carter, Judith Curry and the inimitable London-based Benny Peiser and his Global Warming Policy Foundation. No, I decided back in 2002 that The Australian would report the IPCC and the work of scientists in the field but would also open its pages to dissenters, both on the science and the economics. Our readers approve and have made this paper the nation’s most successful digital publisher.”

Former editor in chief Chris Mitchell explains where his newspaper’s climate denialism started.

The Latham Moment
Just on 15 years ago, almost half the country voted for Mark Latham. Now, the former Labor leader is a One Nation representative who could play a significant role in the new right.

1/3

The proportion of taxpayer-funded bonuses claimed by ParentsNext providers for getting participants into education that were “noncompliant”, according to a government audit.

“This will be the first inquiry into the use of nuclear power in Australia in more than a decade and is designed to consider the economic, environmental and safety implications of nuclear power … I am confident that your committee – involving all sides of politics – is the best way to consider this issue in a sensible way.”

Energy Minister Angus Taylor writes to Ted O’Brien, chair of the government-dominated House Standing Committee on the Environment and Energy.

The list
 

“There is no hope of capturing the vastness of commentary spent on Folau. The case became a Rorschach test for culture warriors, and was whatever they wanted it to be. For the LGBTIQ community affected by personal experience of homophobia, it was about vilification and mental health. For a caravan of right-wing politicians, activists and opinion-shapers, it was about freedom of speech.

“Data from the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) survey shows almost a third of casual workers in Australia are earning less than the minimum wage. Even after allowing for measurement error, the number could still be as high as 15 per cent of casual workers.”

“The ‘dining boom’ is a high-value, high-employment alternative to the busted minerals and energy bonanza. Exports of processed food, beverages and fresh produce hit nearly $27 billion in 2014–15: a rise of nearly $4 billion from the previous year, helped by a weaker dollar. These industries already employ nearly 300,000 people. With Asia’s middle classes growing, the prospects look bright.

Paddy Manning

Paddy Manning is contributing editor (politics) at The Monthly and has worked for the ABC, Fairfax, Crikey and The Australian. He is also the author of three books, including a recently updated unauthorised biography of Malcolm Turnbull, Born To Rule?

 

The Monthly Today

The PM’s talking points

An accidental email sets out the government’s threadbare agenda

Litmus test

The US withdrawal from Syria is a turning point for Australian foreign policy

Labor pains

Climate confusion continues in the ALP

The invisible handshake

Australia’s lobbying-industrial complex needs urgent reform


From the front page

The PM’s talking points

An accidental email sets out the government’s threadbare agenda

Image of Joel Fitzgibbon and Anthony Albanese

Climate of blame

Labor runs the risk of putting expediency over principle

Litmus test

The US withdrawal from Syria is a turning point for Australian foreign policy

Afterwards, nothing is the same: Shirley Hazzard

On the splendour of the acclaimed author’s distinctly antipodean seeing


×
×