Tuesday, October 13, 2015

Today by Nick Feik

Metadata retention begins
New anti-privacy law is another step down a dangerous path

Today, the new metadata retention law comes into effect in Australia. Data about your communications must be retained by communications providers for at least two years.

Don’t care?

This data includes every number you call or message, the time at which you do it, and where you were at the time. If you email or use the internet, it includes the time and duration of your web connections, the location and volume of data.

You data will be accessible without warrants by all state and territory police forces and at least 13 other organisations (including, for instance, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission), as well as any other agency the Attorney General publicly declares.

Not concerned yet?

Metadata is a fairly bland and inoffensive term, which is probably why this legislation got through parliament (voted through by both Labor and Liberal parties). But in the modern world it covers our most intimate communications.

“If you call a suicide prevention hotline,” as cryptographer and computer security expert Bruce Schneier explained to Lateline, “it doesn’t matter what you say; it’s the fact that you called them. (Metadata reveals) who we associate with, what our interests are, who we are, what we are.”  Not to mention where we are, and when we are there. Health websites, calls to specialist doctors, browser histories, activist forums …

Some elements of the new regime are dangerous and some are simply absurd: Two-thirds of local internet service providers aren’t confident they fully understand what data the government wants collected; none know how much it’s going to cost; none are ready for it or understand details about exemptions or the legal details around aspects such as encryption or how securely all this data needs to be stored. To remind readers: this law is supposed to be implemented from today. (ISPs have until April 2017 to become “fully compliant”.)

But the most absurd thing about new data retention regime is how arbitrary it is. It doesn’t collect data from non-Australian email providers, for example.

What is the national-security value of a data-collection regime that doesn’t collect Gmail data? Or that can be circumvented by using Facebook messenger, Twitter direct messages or Google chat?

In these circumstances, data collection is not a means to fight terrorism; ASIO and other security organisations already have far greater surveillance capacities than these. This kind of collection regime simply extends powers that were created to track genuine security risks to all citizens.

Without any oversight, it is open to abuse: arbitrary powers are always distributed unevenly, it’s an iron rule.

In Australia’s case, we have no way of knowing how and when our data will be used. You may trust what you don’t know, of course, but it wouldn’t be very clever.

Still don’t care?

As Edward Snowden has said, “Arguing that you don't care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don't care about free speech because you have nothing to say.”


Today’s links

Nick Feik

Nick Feik is the editor of The Monthly.



The Monthly Today

Image of Minister for Skills Michaelia Cash


The looming training overhaul will need to be watched closely

Image of chair of the National COVID-19 Coordination Commission and former Fortescue Metals chief executive Neville Power

Building back better?

The government’s pandemic response is taking a familiar shape

An unavoidable recession

The pandemic got us in, the treasurer must get us out

Image of protest against police violence in Minneapolis, Minnesota on May 26, 2020

Black Lives Matter

Australia should draw lessons from the riots in the US

From the front page

Image of Minister for Skills Michaelia Cash


The looming training overhaul will need to be watched closely

Cold was the ground: ‘Sorry for Your Trouble’

Richard Ford delivers an elegant collection of stories of timeworn men and women contemplating the end

Photograph of Malcolm Turnbull

Surrounded by pygmies: Malcolm Turnbull’s ‘A Bigger Picture’

The former PM’s memoir fails to reckon with his fatal belief that all Australians shared his vision

Child's illustration

The screens that ate school

What do we really know about the growing presence of Google, Apple, Microsoft and more in the education system?