Tuesday, October 13, 2015

Today by Nick Feik

Metadata retention begins
New anti-privacy law is another step down a dangerous path

Today, the new metadata retention law comes into effect in Australia. Data about your communications must be retained by communications providers for at least two years.

Don’t care?

This data includes every number you call or message, the time at which you do it, and where you were at the time. If you email or use the internet, it includes the time and duration of your web connections, the location and volume of data.

You data will be accessible without warrants by all state and territory police forces and at least 13 other organisations (including, for instance, the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission), as well as any other agency the Attorney General publicly declares.

Not concerned yet?

Metadata is a fairly bland and inoffensive term, which is probably why this legislation got through parliament (voted through by both Labor and Liberal parties). But in the modern world it covers our most intimate communications.

“If you call a suicide prevention hotline,” as cryptographer and computer security expert Bruce Schneier explained to Lateline, “it doesn’t matter what you say; it’s the fact that you called them. (Metadata reveals) who we associate with, what our interests are, who we are, what we are.”  Not to mention where we are, and when we are there. Health websites, calls to specialist doctors, browser histories, activist forums …

Some elements of the new regime are dangerous and some are simply absurd: Two-thirds of local internet service providers aren’t confident they fully understand what data the government wants collected; none know how much it’s going to cost; none are ready for it or understand details about exemptions or the legal details around aspects such as encryption or how securely all this data needs to be stored. To remind readers: this law is supposed to be implemented from today. (ISPs have until April 2017 to become “fully compliant”.)

But the most absurd thing about new data retention regime is how arbitrary it is. It doesn’t collect data from non-Australian email providers, for example.

What is the national-security value of a data-collection regime that doesn’t collect Gmail data? Or that can be circumvented by using Facebook messenger, Twitter direct messages or Google chat?

In these circumstances, data collection is not a means to fight terrorism; ASIO and other security organisations already have far greater surveillance capacities than these. This kind of collection regime simply extends powers that were created to track genuine security risks to all citizens.

Without any oversight, it is open to abuse: arbitrary powers are always distributed unevenly, it’s an iron rule.

In Australia’s case, we have no way of knowing how and when our data will be used. You may trust what you don’t know, of course, but it wouldn’t be very clever.

Still don’t care?

As Edward Snowden has said, “Arguing that you don't care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don't care about free speech because you have nothing to say.”


Today’s links

Nick Feik

Nick Feik is the editor of The Monthly.



The Monthly Today

Image of Home Affairs Minister Peter Dutton speaking during Question Time today

‘She said, he said’

Let’s consider what has been said

Image of Defence Minister Linda Reynolds during Question Time in the Senate yesterday

Take the fall

A woman is going to take the blame. Again.

Image of federal member for Hughes Craig Kelly, who has quit the Liberal Party

Kelly a crass bencher

Craig Kelly has quit the Liberal Party to sit on the crossbench. For now.

Image of Prime Minister Scott Morrison speaking in Question Time today.

Getting away with it

It’s clear someone has lied. So who’s going to take the fall?

From the front page

Image of Home Affairs Minister Peter Dutton speaking during Question Time today

‘She said, he said’

Let’s consider what has been said

Image of Stephen Graham as Joseph McCarthy in The Virtues

Its own reward: ‘The Virtues’

Topping February’s streaming highlights is a four-part series examining trauma and addiction, propelled by Stephen Graham’s affecting performance

Image of ‘Fragile Monsters’

‘Fragile Monsters’ by Catherine Menon

Memories of the Malayan Emergency resurface when a mathematician returns to her home country, in the British author’s debut novel

In light of recent events

Track your vaccine with Australia Post