
Sunk cost
Was Labor’s modest deficit gap really worth two days of tantrums?It’s been a slow news day (in federal politics, at least). The closest thing to a story has been the steady stream of speculation about the government’s plans for changes to the tax system – or “reform”, if you prefer. It’s speculation because the government hasn’t said much about it yet, aside from that it will be happening. The goal will be greater efficiency, rather than raising more money directly: as Malcolm Turnbull put it, “a more efficient tax system, even if it only raises the same amount of money, would likely increase revenues over time because you would get stronger GDP growth”.
Despite the lack of concrete policies, campaigning and market-testing has begun. At the start of the week, Nationals MP David Gillespie released some figures he’d asked the Parliamentary Budget Office to crunch out on the effect of increasing the GST rate from 10% to 15% and reducing the exemptions from it (such as healthcare and education). The projected result: an extra $65 billion in revenue in financial year 2017/18.
Gillespie was at pains to make clear that it was all his own idea: “It's not part of a coordinated program, I just got off my butt and did this myself.” Nonetheless, it has started a conversation that is very useful for the government: the public mood is sounded, politicians get to take a stand for or against, commentators let their views be known.
Not that most of the views are very surprising: Tony Shepherd, who led last year’s National Commission of Audit, thinks it’s simply a reality that people will have to accept; some Coalition backbenchers have expressed reservations; Labor is dead-set against. Scott Morrison has refused to be drawn; all proposals are welcome, he says, but the process is in its discovery phase.
As for the public: no-one likes higher taxes per se, but perhaps they can be talked around. We do know that a lot of people feel that the cost of living is rising and their incomes are not keeping up. The GST is a regressive tax, in that it disproportionately affects people on lower incomes. (The discovery phase has not yet turned up many options to extract more cash from the already wealthy.) Any increase to the GST would need to be clearly balanced with cuts to other taxes if it wants popular support.
Still, the idea is a live one now. We will all have a while to get used to it, and no-one will be too surprised if it comes back again next year. And if it doesn’t come back, well, it was just a bit of freelancing from a northern NSW backbencher.
Sunk cost
Was Labor’s modest deficit gap really worth two days of tantrums?At what cost?
The press pack is laser focused on something voters don’t really care aboutAlpha-beta soup
A toxic op-ed about Morrison being an “alpha male” fails to grasp why women are abandoning the CoalitionThe loosest unit
The Coalition doesn’t know how much its superannuation housing policy will raise prices, nor does it careIn light of recent events
Who’s preferencing whom?Ghost notes: Simon Tedeschi’s ‘Fugitive’
A virtuoso memoir of music and trauma, and his experiences as a child prodigy, from the acclaimed Australian pianistThe quip and the dead: Steve Toltz’s ‘Here Goes Nothing’
A bleakly satirical look at death and the afterlife from the wisecracking author of ‘A Fraction of the Whole’Election special: Who should you vote for?
Undecided about who to vote for in the upcoming federal election? Take our quiz to find out your least-worst option!