Investing in women’s workforce participation is going to cost money. Where is Labor going to find it?
Labor’s Jobs and Skills Summit got off to an auspicious start this morning, amid the release of a major agreement from the Business Council of Australia and the Australian Council of Trade Unions. Their joint statement set out several shared principles, including the need to boost women’s workforce participation through the expansion of Commonwealth paid parental leave to 26 weeks, with incentives to encourage both parents to share in it. Much of the morning agenda was focused on women: a panel discussing equal opportunities and pay found itself in furious agreement (Minister for Women and Finance Katy Gallagher declared it a “core economic imperative”), while fixing childcare was said to be key to growing the economy (Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews called it “perhaps the biggest lever that we can pull”). Many are now calling for federal Labor’s childcare subsidies to be brought forward, but, as with calls to expand parental leave, ministers say it’s going to be difficult to find the cash. These are indeed very expensive, though very important, policy solutions. So how is the government going to ensure the summit is more than a “talkfest”, a forum in which solutions are found but then gently ignored?
It has been widely noted how different this event looks to Bob Hawke’s 1983 summit, in which all the business and union delegates were men. As Laura Tingle pointed out on 7.30 last night, those setting the agenda ahead of the current summit were all women, namely, the BCA’s Jennifer Westacott and the ACTU’s Sally McManus and Michele O’Neil. The opening remarks today (after the PM and treasurer) were made by Grattan Institute chief executive Danielle Wood, who was there to discuss the goals of full employment and productivity growth. “If untapped women’s workforce participation was a massive ore deposit, we would have governments lining up to give tax concessions to get it out of the ground,” she quipped. Independent MP Zoe Daniel is calling for the summit to pay more than “lip service to equality”, and presented a list of ideas including bringing forward those childcare subsidies. As KPMG national chair Alison Kitchen pointed out, such subsidies have “tangible economic benefits”, with GDP boosted by almost $2 for every dollar invested.
This all sounds promising. In just one morning, there have been many incredible solutions put forward and many excellent points made, with everyone seemingly in agreement as to what needs to be done. But as Treasurer Jim Chalmers keeps insisting, Labor can’t fund every idea (he is reportedly refusing to take on any more unfunded budget requests, even if they will pay economic dividends, meaning that bringing forward the childcare subsidies is all but off the table). Speaking on RN Breakfast this morning, Gallagher – putting her finance minister hat on – also lowered expectations of the paid parental leave expansion, noting that the budget remains in huge amounts of debt. This, of course, was a perfect opening to ask about the Stage Three tax cuts (which I have previously noted, will come up every time the government can’t afford to pay for something). Host Patricia Karvelas duly obliged, pointing out that these cuts overwhelmingly favour men. “Does that sit comfortably with you?” Karvelas asked. “It’s the reality that men earn more than women and are over-represented in those higher income thresholds,” Gallagher responded.
That is, unfortunately, the reality – and it’s a reality that the opening sessions of the government’s jobs summit were supposedly all about fixing. But why ask women (and economists, and trade unionists, and business leaders) for their big ideas if there’s no way for them to be implemented? It’s not fair to say that the summit is simply a “talkfest” or a “stunt”, as the Opposition has been saying for weeks now. These are important national conversations, and it’s brilliant that they are taking place in a public forum. But there’s little point putting women’s economic equality “front and centre” of the summit, as Gallagher maintained that the treasurer had done, if the government won’t put it front and centre of its policymaking.
GOOD OPINION
Word of advice
|
|
|
|
|
“We need to see that advice and whether it supports today’s decision. If it doesn’t, the politicians need to explain themselves.”
|
|
|
|
AMA president Steve Robson calls for the release of health advice underpinning national cabinet’s decision to reduce the COVID-19 isolation period, noting that up to 30 per cent of people are likely to still be infectious on days six and seven.
|
|
|
|
BAD OPINION
Campaign socialist
|
|
|
|
|
“The process was the election campaign. Once the people of South Australia have had their say on an event or a piece of infrastructure, that is supreme.”
|
|
|
|
South Australian Infrastructure Minister Tom Koutsantonis defends giving community funding almost exclusively to Labor seats, insisting that there’s no need for an independent assessment because the people voted for it. The Grattan Institute disagrees.
|
|
|
|
7am Podcast
‘If they want to survive, time for them to run’: Ukraine’s new plan
|
|
|
|
|
There are signs that Ukraine has begun its biggest counteroffensive yet to win back territory held by Russian forces. It’s too soon to know if the operation will succeed or how concerted the effort will be, but there’s no doubt that a new battle in the war would be difficult and costly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The number of extra fee-free TAFE places to be created from next year, after a $1.1 billion deal was struck between federal, state and territory governments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Policy
Questions around environmental offsets
|
|
|
|
|
The Greens are calling for all environmental offsets schemes to be suspended pending a review, after the NSW system was found to be riddled with integrity concerns. The Australia Institute has slammed the federal government’s new biodiversity certificates scheme, calling it “another false solution”.
|
|
|
|
|
|