Thursday, 27th February 2014


Qantas this morning reported a $252 million half-year loss and announced it would cut 5000 jobs as part of an overall plan to reduce costs by $2 billion over 3 years.

The results come as the government weighs up assistance measures for the struggling airline.

Here's the conundrum: Joe Hockey and colleagues have spent the last few months banging on about the end of the "age of entitlement" and stopping corporate welfare to companies (and people) that are undeserving. But here is a company that has been seriously mismanaged and is now crying poor.

Qantas already receives significant benefits from being Australia's "national flag carrier", in terms of airport/route access and public service and defence personnel travel arrangements. It has cash reserves of $3 billion and a frequent flyer program that could be sold off as an separate entity, worth $1.5-$2.5 billion.

But it needs help because some other airlines are state-subsidised? This should be beside the point, if we are to take the government's broader arguments about economic rationalism to their logical conclusion.

The argument for assistance in fact rests entirely on its sense of corporate entitlement: it's Qantas. It's just different because it's our "brand" and of national importance.

Which is perfectly reasonable, but let's not kid ourselves.

Nick Feik
Politicoz Editor

Sign up to get Politicoz delivered
to your email address every weekday at lunch time.

Qantas to slash 5000 jobs as it posts $252m first half loss

"The airline says the job cuts, which follow what chief executive Alan Joyce says is an “unacceptable” loss, are part of its bid to cut $2 billion in costs over three years. It also says it will cut capital expenditure by $1 billion over the next two financial years and is planning big changes to its fleet and network."

AlsoQantas hangs in the balance while politicians argue (Guardian)

Food lobby group 'raised concerns with Senator Fiona Nash' on day ratings website was pulled

"A powerful food industry lobby group says it contacted Assistant Health Minister Fiona Nash to raise concerns about a Government food star rating website the same day it was pulled down. Senator Nash has come under fire for ordering the Health Department to take down its food rating website hours after it went live."

Manus Island review into violence will focus heavily on security at the centre

"The terms of reference for a review into the unrest at the Manus Island processing centre will focus heavily on the management of security at the centre... The Greens senator Sarah Hanson-Young said the terms were “entirely inadequate” to fully examine the role of the immigration minister, Scott Morrison, and his department."

AlsoManus Island violence: Fatal violence occurred after G4S guards went in, PNG report finds (SMH)

And: Where is the alternative to Manus Island cruelty? (Jonathan Green, The Drum)

Audit cold on Abbott’s parent leave

"The Commission of Audit has criticised the government’s proposed paid parental leave scheme as excessive at a time when fiscal restraint is needed. The Australian Financial Review understands the commission’s interim report, delivered to the government 13 days ago, supports the concept of paid parental leave but finds that Mr Abbott’s scheme is too generous given the state of budget."

AlsoNew white paper urges doubling of defence spending to $50bn (The Australian)

Consumers rule where politicians fail

"Cashed-up shoppers are exercising greater purchasing muscle than the feeble industry plans of union hand-maidens like Carr. Consumerism has finally beaten interventionism. The political class does not want to hear this, but we have entered an era of marginalised government. Each day, the big news in the Australian economy is the strength of millions of consumer decisions, but this is essentially unreported in the electronic media."