June 2005

Arts & Letters


By Malcolm Knox

“The event that dislocated our period from the last was September 11.”

“Oh-one. Twin Towers. Splatter patterns. It’s raining men, hallelujah ...

“Hush. The event to which you refer merely amplified the existing order, even accelerated its actions. No. I am referring to September 11, 2006. The so-called Anniversary Attacks.”

“Oh-six. The triumph of the I.”

“Of the Eye, you mean. Yes. You are too young to remember, of course, but that event shaped you as much as your mother’s milk. It shaped us all, for it altered the curvature of the space we inhabit.”

“The Would-Be Attacks. The Loony Losers. The Fuck-Up Fundos. We Report, You Decide ...

“You are a creature of your time, my child, and a creature of the second September 11. When those four warriors in greatcoats were prevented from detonating a nuclear device in New York City they were barely older than you are now. Children, really. What it told us about our children was perhaps the most gruesome illumination of all.”

“Save the Children. Suffer the Little Children.”

“The boy warriors: walking the streets, catching the subway, stepping out into the bright blue sunshine, lost in their fantasy of themselves. They were said to believe in religion, but these were American boys and their religion was the moving picture and the video game. What did they believe in? That they were stars in an adventure of their own making? How close they were to the truth.”

“Flatbush Avenue. Coffee, Dunkin Donuts. Brooklyn-to-212th Street service. Change to the A-train at Union Square. Downtown to Wall Street. Heading west at time of arrest.”

“Yes, yes, their footsteps became part of our folklore. They spawned walking tours, songs, incantations. How we celebrate our survival. The size of the blast and the number of casualties, had the boy warriors detonated their suitcase, was open to conjecture. Some said it would have been lucky – unlucky – to take out more than a city block. A dirty bomb is not always as apocalyptic as it sounds. But few were interested in the magnitude of the blast. It was a matter of principle. A weapon of mass destruction is a weapon of mass destruction, even if it had only killed the bombers themselves.”

“A nuclear bomb set to go off in the world’s greatest city! On the very day when the President, the leaders of Congress, potentates from around the globe, were in harm’s way!

“A movie, yes. A big-budget spectacular. Although it has to be said the production values were of variable quality. The four bombers were indistinct shadows skip-jumping past an automatic teller machine on Flatbush Avenue. Low-grade black-and-white in Dunkin Donuts. Some nicer colour full-face angles entering the subway in Brooklyn, and then some quite artistic portraits in motion through the interchange at Union Square. By the time they were downtown, well-resourced police camera crews had scrambled to record the bombers’ exit into the daylight and their last walk towards ground zero. The final action sequence, the climactic chase scene, was shot by a Hollywood veteran director of photography, Hilt Maxim, now of course the head of the NYPD’s cinematography unit. The final scenes, after re-cutting and a professional sound mix including foley, were cinema-quality.”


“Yes, success. Even before the four were brought to trial, the video evidence of their near-deadly journey was screened around the world. And not only that. The seizure of their cell phones enabled authorities to track down every person with whom the four had had a conversation. The seizure of those individuals’ phones in turn revealed every person with whom they had had conversations. And so on, in a finite but numberless progression, a super-virus of names, numbers, identities. The Dunkin Donuts meal was purchased with a credit card, and so the police were able to build a comprehensive record of the owner’s whereabouts going back several years. The four were carrying no personal documents, but once their identities were established police could access every time they had been to the doctor, and every other person who had been to the same doctor. Through their employment histories we could find out every website they had visited, every email they had sent from their workplaces, every time they had been tested for drugs and alcohol. Their genes and their blood were public. They had been filmed at work and so we could compile a portrait of their most insignificant actions. Of course, nothing was insignificant. Through their drivers’ licences, every car they had owned or rented. Every time they had been to their DVD library. Every bank account they had opened. Every gift they had sent. Their school grades. Through their electronic toll tags, every time they had crossed into the city or on any turnpike road. These four were transformed from nobodies, invisible men, into, literally, the best-documented lives of our time. They were public figures before they knew it.”

“Celebrity Squares.”

“Well, yes, they did become famous, and life in jail only enhanced their celebrity. Every litre of air they breathed, every second they slept, every pace in the exercise yard they trod, was filmed, measured and recorded, and finally – due to overwhelming public demand – released in a format accompanied by appropriately serious qualifications. The President himself provided the introductory sequences to the prison film.”

“Lifestyles of the poor and famous ...

“You will not know this, child, and this will seem like an antique concern, but there were those in our community who, while relieved that the nuclear plot was thwarted, were aghast at the extent of surveillance in public places that the prosecution case revealed. It was not common knowledge, for instance, that cameras were stationed on most street corners in metropolitan areas. It was not commonly known that health records could be linked centrally to social security, education, housing and immigration records. These men had no criminal background and had never found their way into the newspapers. They had never been under any kind of anti-terrorism surveillance. They had been utterly unknown. And yet, within weeks, the world knew them as intimately as each of us knew ourselves. So some of us asked: could this happen to us? Are we all, in fact, open books that can be opened at the whim of authority?”

“Civil Liberties. Industrial Revolution. Steam Engine.”

“Yes, you know of the past from your schoolbooks. But it is not as long ago as you might think that there were people who believed privacy was an inalieanable human entitlement. Quite simply, they had no idea that an individual who was not of prior interest to the police could be tracked so closely. They had no idea so many cameras and other means of recording movement existed. It frightened them.”

“Nothing to Hide, Nothing to Fear.”

“Yes, yes, the catchphrase of our time. If you had nothing to hide then you had no cause to be afraid. It was only the guilty who needed to worry about the cameras and the spiderweb of personal records. And so, in a corollary of that logic, perhaps those who were worried – the civil libertarians – were guilty. Perhaps their anxiety proved their guilt.”

“Nothing to Fear, Nothing to Hide.”

“But the ancient guild of civil libertarians were not silenced by intimidation or arrest. There was no need for that. They were silenced by euphoria. Euphoria and anxiety did battle for a short time, but euphoria would win. Look at the bomb! Look at what we were saved from! Relive the drama of the capture! There was no contest. We had been saved from annihilation, or so we were told, and no price was too great to pay. The surveillance of individuals had certified its own necessity.”

“The highest civil right is the right to live.”

“Child, you say it as if you believe it. You are a creature of your time. ‘The highest civil right is the right to live’ – the President’s own words, spoken to the appreciative hum of a grateful world. The Anniversary Attacks proved him correct: any other human rights were secondary to the protection of life. Next to it, privacy was a trifle.”

“Privacy – a temporary illusion of anarchic times.”

“You remember your school lessons well. This period was the Eye’s apotheosis. Correspondingly, it was the end of what my generation called privacy. You were taught in school that ‘privacy’ was a tangent, a glitch in human history. You can only say the word with inverted commas around it. Since when had the notion of ‘privacy’ existed? Look back through time and all societies were communal, safe, pure and open, because in tribes and villages there were no secrets. Families were strong, and families knew all. As village life subsided and cities grew, and as humans were alienated from each other, the compensation for their separation was the propaganda-fuelled notion that their ‘privacy’ was something to be cherished. That it was better to have a life that could be kept secret from others. I know, child, it sounds absurd to you, but this belief persisted until my lifetime. What we learned later was that ‘privacy’ produced agony in individuals and war between nations. ‘Privacy’ isolated us from each other, and from our better natures. In our secret worlds we developed hatred for outsiders. ‘Privacy’ was what had produced those four sick young men. Look through history and what was ‘privacy’ but an aberration of the industrial era? Those countries that did not fetishise ‘privacy’ were the most successful in the 21st century. The People’s Republic, as always, was our model. A sophisticated culture was by necessity a village culture – cohesion was achieved by the absence of secrets. If you entertained terrorist thoughts in the PR, even silently, even in your sleep, they would soon be unveiled. This was a good, productive, functional society. The notion of ‘privacy’ was another facet of Western arrogance. It existed nowhere else in the world, and nowhere else in time. Once we realised that it was easier to let it go.”

“The poor people nobody cared for. Boo-hoo, orphans.”

“Yes, you were taught that the generations preceding yours were abandoned. Nobody was watching my heart rate while I slept. Nobody kept a daily log of my movements around the house. Nobody was watching out for me while I swam in my pool. How sad and lonely must I have been? It all changed in your time, when every one of your daily activities was logged and monitored and, as you put it, cared for.”

“Our Golden Age. ”

“Yes, our Golden Age began with the Anniversary Attacks. If an unknown terrorist cell, self-funded and self-motivated, without any links to known organisations, could be thwarted from detonating a nuclear device in New York City – then what hope did regular criminals have of succeeding? Most crime is unlike that attempted by those four young men. Most crime is patterned, committed by career criminals. So if the instant transmission of suspicious behaviour could stop an attack by non-criminals, what hope did recidivists have?”

“The end of crime.”

“Sex offenders had been fitted with global positioning devices – tracking devices – since 2005. The rate of sex crime by previous offenders, which had comprised 80% of all sex crimes, fell to nearly zero. The insertion of GPS devices, after this celebrated success, was extended to cover other kinds of criminals. Soon every man and woman who had served a jail sentence was fitted with a satellite tracking device. Cameras could locate them at the touch of a button. The authorities knew not only where they were but where they had been. This was the ultimate deterrent to crime: you could not get away with it.”

“Big Brother is Watching You.”

“I detect the sarcasm in your tone, child. ‘Big Brother is Watching You’ was the last anguished cry of the civil libertarians. They feared that the level of surveillance over citizens was prone to abuse by the authorities. By ceding so much power to those who watched, we were risking its arbitrary and unjust exercise. Yet this too was held to be an antique anxiety. Already we allowed police to carry handguns. We let the armed forces equip themselves with all manner of weaponry. Did that lead to the end of the world? Of course not. Occasional mistakes notwithstanding, the police and the armed services were trustworthy. They had proved it with weaponry, so why should they not be trusted with cameras? The police and the army were the most respected, most trusted institutions in our society. Who else would you entrust with the means of surveillance? It was argued that ‘power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely’. But this was another artefact, a museum piece, from the industrial age, from the ‘privacy’ fetishists. Our protectors, our department of homeland security, had shown that absolute power need not corrupt the holder. In fact, absolute power just made it harder for criminals and terrorists to harm the innocent. To hurt our children. To shatter our society. Absolute power, when it was in the hands of the good, could only be put to good use. And that was what we saw in our Golden Age. Plummeting crime rates, the end of the terrorist threat, safety for all – all thanks to cameras and tracking devices and the immense resources allocated to real-time response.”

“Reality time.”

“The victory of the Eye gifted you with a safe childhood. We did not need to worry about strangers in cars, about men taking you away to commit unthinkable crimes – because we knew where they were. Better yet, they knew we knew where they were. These kinds of criminals had always held that their proclivities were biological, irremediable. We discovered otherwise. Once they knew they could not get away with it, they desisted. Not all of them, of course; there were always some who wanted to challenge their woven-in GPS devices. But these are by and large timid creatures. They found that when they had no hope of secrecy, their urges were not biological at all. They were a matter of choice.”

“Freedom of choice / Is what you want / Freedom from choice / Is what you got.”

“Of course sexual predators were not the only threat to our children. Fear of losing a child is the most powerful motivator of all. Knowing where your children are is a great salve for that fear. For many years, parents had been giving their children cell phones and using them as tracking devices. The child might have used the cell phone to communicate with friends but the cell phone’s real use, as dictated by the person who bought it, was surveillance. Parents could call their children and check on them whenever they grew anxious.”

“Liar Liar Pants on Fire.”

“Well, yes, the child could always lie about her whereabouts. But this was soon remedied with the spread of transponder technology. Previously used in law enforcement, transponders – signal-emitting tracking devices – were fitted to cellular telephones, then ultimately linked to satellite photographic technology, so that the child had no way of credibly lying. She could give her phone to somebody else, to throw the watchers out, but independent corroboration was available in instant satellite photography. In short, children could do nothing that their parents were unaware of. It gave us peace of mind.”

“All we are saying / Is give peace a chance.”

“It must seem strange to you, the Eye being of help to parents. Things are altogether different now. But you were privileged, you must not forget that. You had a childhood where your chances of being hurt, or of hurting yourself, were greatly diminished. As your parent, I can tell you it was a wonderful thing.”

“It’s a wonderful world. So why – why flee from it?


“You, of all people, know why we are fleeing. But you may not be aware that you know it. That is what I am trying to tell you: to guide you towards that which you already know. Your problem is not that things are hidden from you. Your problem is that you don’t know how to see what is in front of your eyes.”

“You can run, but you can’t hide.”

“Never have truer words been spoken.”

“Out of the mouths of babes.”

“Sometimes you stumble across the apt phrase. But where were we? Yes, yes, I was telling you how blissful was your childhood. You knew nothing else in the world but your own appetites, unconstricted by fear – or the most constrictive kind of fear, which is your parents’ fear for your welfare. Now. Where was I? Yes – transponders for all. A pattern of those years, you must realise, was the democratisation of technology. Devices that were formerly the property of the intelligence agencies, or the police, or the armed forces, became available to anyone. Developments in technology constantly tended towards reducing the cost of each device, so that by 2001 I was technologically better equipped in my own home than the CIA had been 15 years earlier. Satellite imaging, closed-circuit cameras, transponders, wireless communications – a process worker could afford a total household surveillance fit-out by the first decade of this century …

“And likewise with the inspection of others’ affairs online. I know how much you laugh when you see those old spy movies from the 1980s – how secret cameras and listening devices and bugs and wiretaps seem so clandestine and top-level. By your time, as you know, the means of peering into other lives was fully democratic. As was the willingness to be spied upon. There were those who advertised themselves on the internet as the subject of spying. They did not care who looked. They had nothing to hide, nothing to fear. They lived their lives in front of the camera. Their consciousness was fed into the eye – they lived as performers, as works of art, or as the raw material for art. What was shocking to older people was not that strangers could do so much spying; what was shocking was that so many were so willing to be spied upon, that so many were thrilled by the idea of the unknown viewer.”

“I-spy with my little eye.”

“Its immediate effects were rejoiced. We were relieved of the phenomenon known as ‘celebrity’, for instance – the mass worship of human icons. A groundswell against ‘celebrity’ had arisen since the turn of the century, with ‘celebrities’ being bashed and in some cases murdered by infuriated or disillusioned ‘fans’. What arose in its place was ‘microcelebrity’, individuals whose fame was as magnetic as that of the old celebrities but who were known only to the few who watched them online. Home exhibitionists, webloggers, visual diarists – these were the microcelebrities. We were all living in the public eye. But what microcelebrity portended was ‘microcommunities’. There was, by 2020, no longer such a thing as a ‘mass audience’. Our society splintered into microcommunities with their own separate interests and separate cultures, as exemplified by their own separate microcelebrities. What was changing was not the human desire to worship idols; what was changing was society itself.”

“Things fall apart. The centre will not hold.”

“The centre did not hold. The time of your youth was the time of fragmentation – a celebration of individuality and rebellion from old social values, and a reconfiguration of nations into smaller groupings defined by ethnicity, age, class, religion and sometimes, merely, taste in music and fashion. Or I should not say merely, because it was these niches that were the strongest microcommunities. You were defined by what you consumed. People coalesced around their common pursuit of certain goods. How did they coalesce? They were shaped by the really influential powers of our time: the forces of commerce ...”

“Need To Know ...

“Fear of the state was, at least for a time, unfounded. Corporations, not the state, were driving the Need To Know. Whenever you bought, say, an item of clothing or homeware, your choice was connected into a vast database which could then analyse your choices over a range of products and compile a ‘consumer profile’ of you, which would be used to anticipate – and create – your future needs. The end of privacy was a windfall for corporations. For they could know what you wanted before you wanted it. They could create microcommunities around their products. They could harness what used to be known as human emotions – fear, greed, anxiety – just as we had once harnessed hydro-electric power. Once your day-to-day movements, your medical needs, your household spending, your educational and employment status, your cultural affiliations, as well as the old markers of age, race and religion were in the hands of corporations, you became a fixed and predictable quantity. You became a machine of productivity that had to be fed, clothed, housed and diverted. You were free from your workplace, but in exchange for letting you go sailing all day your corporate master could make you work while you were on your boat. You had unlimited leisure, and no real leisure at all. But who would trade it for the past, when my people were caged into our workplaces? No. You loved the present. It was the best of times. You would never choose to live at any other moment in history. This made you a much more malleable entity than you had been in the past.”

“The past is another country.”

“Other countries, nevertheless, do not always remain other. Other countries can move upon our countries. The past can invade the present. You see, to this point I have been talking only of our country and others like it, what used to be known as the ‘developed world’. But those who wanted to see the future needed only to look at other continents. Africa. The South. The predication of our Golden Age was that surveillance technology became cheaper and more democratically used. Power devolved. But this was not the case in other countries. In Africa, the new surveillance technology was owned only by the state. And these were countries of scarcity, where competition for limited resources was so brutal that a weapon, such as surveillance technology, could be used for more efficient suppression. In our country, our Golden Age ironed out inequality of access to technology. Anyone could own a cell phone, a transponder, a household iris scanner. Anyone could go online. But in the regions of scarcity, surveillance technology enforced inequality. Only the powerful minorities owned the hardware. So the technological revolution accelerated and hardened the brutalisation of the masses. These societies were much more complete and whole than ours – ironically, because they shared in common a single ruler and a single controlled mass. No fragmentation there ...

“For a time, we believed we would escape this. We believed our society was different because of our ethical and racial superiority. Africans, Latin Americans, Central Asians were inferior. This was why they let themselves be ruled undemocratically. They wasted their resources. But the truth was different. Our Golden Age was founded on plenty. The spread of technology was not a benefit of superior organisation. It was a benefit of being able to exploit cheap labour and inequalities in currency. We weren’t rich because we were clever. We were clever because we were rich. Nobody understood this, of course ... until we started to become poorer. The cost of energy – so much harder to control and exploit cross-nationally – rose exponentially. Our crops failed and the seas and the skies reared against us. We borrowed against the promise of ever-growing prosperity. But once the future began to contract, so did the present. We have entered a period of brutality. Our basic resources are soon to be beyond the reach of most of us.”

“So this is why we flee?

“No, this is not why we flee. But this is my warning to you. Our future is African. Our future is control and suppression. Already towns and villages are being wiped from our country. You do not know about this, because there is no longer a mass media to spread the word. Knowledge is open, but who knows where to find it? Who has the time? Who is interested enough? You are locked within your microcommunity. All you know is your immediate surrounds, your interests, your consumer needs. For you, the age is still golden. But the future is closing in. Power is, once again, to emerge from the barrel of a gun ...

“You see, my child, you were all happy to give up your personal privacy, but you would never give up private property. You still had to compete for goods, for rewards, that you could own yourself. Did you see the contradiction? How could you have an open society with private property? You can’t, but so long as prosperity grew there seemed to be no contradiction. Now that we have entered into an age of contraction, older imperatives – antique imperatives – are once again asserting themselves. Humans now have unprecedented means to steal. To commit grand theft. Theft was not a problem while the pie kept getting bigger. But now, microcommunities are falling to micro-armies. There is no central power to stop them, and no central consciousness to know about them. Entire states in the west, the north and the south have fallen. Do you know that? No. You are still living in the immediate past.”

“So where do you flee?

“There is no arcadia, no refuge. There is no way for individuals or communities to wall themselves in, safely. Our future is African. The earth can no longer produce enough for us, so we must change. And we have only ever changed, or been changed, by brute force. This, I tell you, is your future, not mine.”

“The children are our future ...

“I would prefer to infuse you with something of the past. My child, I am fleeing in order to die. I am old, and I crawl away to die like an animal. You know that I am sick, even though you cannot interpret it. You have my medical records, you know all of my vital statistics, but you do not have the eyes into my soul. I remember when you were learning surveillance in your primary school.”

“A satellite for every child ...

“That was the slogan, yes. Surveillance had been parents’ work, but it was all too clear that children were the owners of the future. Children knew how to use the technology better than adults did. I remember when I first found out you were watching me: you stopped asking me where I had been. You knew already. Children in our country became the spies, the watchers. Parents became the watched. I am not telling you anything you do not know. You have been watching me for as long as you can remember. I am your guinea pig, your lab rat. You know more about me than you know of yourself. And yet this is why I am bringing you here, to the wilderness, so you can watch me die – because you know nothing of me. You know a collection of data and movement and consumer activity. And yet, you know nothing. You know the number of everything, the value of nothing. I am your parent, and you have had me under surveillance for 15 years, and yet I am a mystery to you. You do not believe me? But this is what I have brought you out here to see. You shall see me dying. You shall know what happens. Our society has been built for the living, for the immortal, for the youthful. For prosperity. Well, you will soon be old too, and you will die, and if you do not watch what I am to show you, you will enter your last moments in a bleak hell that you can call your own. Your empty phrases, your babbled slogans, your skin-shallow speech, your happiness – none of it will insulate you ...

“You may not care now, you may not wish to reflect or enquire, but the future has a habit of ignoring our wishes. Death will come to you too. Unless I show you who I am, you have no hope of knowing who you are. You have the Eye, but not yet an I. Here, come – child of mine – stranger. I am pleased – overjoyed – to meet you. Let us go and meet mortality.”

Malcolm Knox

Malcolm Knox is a former literary editor of The Sydney Morning Herald, and has won three Walkley awards for journalism. His books include Jamaica, The Life and Bluebird.

There is nowhere quite like The Monthly. We are told that we live in a time of diminished attention spans; a time where the 24-hour-news-cycle has produced a collective desire for hot takes and brief summaries of the news and ideas that effect us. But we don’t believe it. The need for considered, reflective, long-form journalism has never been greater, and for almost 20 years, that’s what The Monthly has offered, from some of our finest writers.

That kind of quality writing costs money, and requires the support of our readers. Your subscription to The Monthly allows us to be the home for the best, most considered, most substantial perspectives on the state of the world. It’s Australia’s only current affairs magazine, an indispensable home for cultural commentary, criticism and reviews, and home to personal and reflective essays that celebrate and elevate our humanity.

The Monthly doesn’t just comment on our culture, our society and our politics: it shapes it. And your subscription makes you part of that.

Select your digital subscription

Month selector

From the front page

Kim Williams seen through window with arms half-raised

The interesting Mr Williams

At a time when the ABC faces more pressure than ever before, is its new chair the right person for the job?

Exterior of the Department of Treasury, Canberra

Tax to grind

Tax reform should not be centred on what we want, but on who we want to be

Rehearsal for the ABC TV show ‘Cooking with Wine’, March 13, 1956

Whose ABC?

Amid questions of relevance and culture war hostilities, the ABC’s charter clearly makes the case for a government-funded national broadcaster

Tony McNamara in New York City, January 2024

Pure things: Tony McNamara

How the Australian screenwriter of ‘Poor Things’, who cut his teeth on shows such as ‘The Secret Life of Us’, earnt his second Oscar nomination

In This Issue

'Lunar Park' by Bret Easton Ellis

'Two Lives' by Vikram Seth

Enrolment Daze

Freedom, order and The Golden Bead Material: a parent’s dilemma

Man Without a Name

A Te Aroha cowboy and his secret part in training the 1985 Melbourne Cup winner

More in Arts & Letters

David Malouf, March 2015 in Sydney

An imagined life: David Malouf

Celebrating the literary great’s 90th birthday with a visit to his incongruous home of Surfers Paradise to discuss a life in letters

Tony McNamara in New York City, January 2024

Pure things: Tony McNamara

How the Australian screenwriter of ‘Poor Things’, who cut his teeth on shows such as ‘The Secret Life of Us’, earnt his second Oscar nomination

Jeffrey Wright in ‘American Fiction’

The dread of the author: ‘American Fiction’ and ‘Argylle’

Cord Jefferson’s satire about Black artists fighting white perceptions of their work runs out of ideas, while Matthew Vaughn’s spy movie parody has no ideas of its own

Illustration by Jeff Fisher

Pictures of you

The award-winning author kicks off our new fiction series with a story of coming to terms with a troubled father’s obsessions

More in The Monthly Essays

Kim Williams seen through window with arms half-raised

The interesting Mr Williams

At a time when the ABC faces more pressure than ever before, is its new chair the right person for the job?

Rehearsal for the ABC TV show ‘Cooking with Wine’, March 13, 1956

Whose ABC?

Amid questions of relevance and culture war hostilities, the ABC’s charter clearly makes the case for a government-funded national broadcaster

Andrew Tate in dark sunglasses flanked by two men, attending his trial in Bucharest, Romania, July 2023

The Tate race

Online misogyny touted by the likes of Andrew Tate (awaiting trial for human trafficking and rape) is radicalising Australian schoolboys

Close-up of smiling Kathleen Folbigg after being acquitted at the New South Wales Court of Criminal Appeal, December 14, 2023

By her own words

How systemic misconceptions around women’s guilt led to a 20-year miscarriage of justice for Kathleen Folbigg

Online latest

Osamah Sami with members of his local mosque

In ‘House of Gods’, Sydney’s Muslim community gets to be complicated

Plus, Barnaby Joyce shines in ‘Nemesis’, Emma Seligman and Rachel Sennott deliver ‘Bottoms’, and Chloë Sevigny and Molly Ringwald step up for ‘Feud: Capote vs. The Swans’.

International Film Festival Rotterdam highlights

Films from Iran, Ukraine and Bundaberg were deserving winners at this year’s festival

Two women on a train smile and shake hands

‘Expats’ drills down on Hong Kong’s class divide

Plus, Netflix swallows Trent Dalton, Deborah Mailman remains in ‘Total Control’ and ‘Vanderpump Rules’ returns for another season

Image of a man playing music using electronics and the kora (West African harp)

Three overlooked albums of spiritual jazz from 2023

Recent releases by kora player John Haycock, trumpeter Matthew Halsall and 14-piece jazz ensemble Ancient Infinity Orchestra feel like a refuge from reality