March 2020

Arts & Letters

They came, they saw: Tamara Kotevska and Ljubomir Stefanov’s ‘Honeyland’

By Shane Danielsen

A breathtaking North Macedonian film about Europe’s last female keeper of wild bees exists compellingly at the intersection of documentary and fiction

At January’s Sundance Film Festival, a minor controversy erupted over a film that most critics agreed was one of the best in this year’s line-up. Programmed as part of the festival’s US Documentary Competition, Bill and Turner Ross’s Bloody Nose, Empty Pockets purported to be a fly-on-the-wall portrait of regular denizens of a Las Vegas dive bar, “The Roaring 20s”, over the course of its final day and night of operation.

All well and good. Except that, as its makers freely conceded after its first screening, their movie wasn’t shot in Vegas at all: it was actually filmed in New Orleans, where the Ross brothers live and where the real Roaring 20’s bar is located. Nor were the barflies depicted simply patrons who happened to wander in. They were in fact men and women the directors had cast after weeks of scouting in other bars – people who, as Bill Ross tactfully put it, “had relationships with alcohol”. One or two were even amateur actors. One day after Trump’s election, back in November 2016, they were assembled by the filmmakers and given just two pieces of direction: first, to pretend the bar they were in was in downtown Las Vegas, and second, that it was closing for good later that night.

But their subsequent interactions and the stories they told weren’t scripted. And both the drinking, and the drunkenness that resulted, were wholly unsimulated. The plan, Turner Ross claimed, was to construct an environment that might then produce “the authentic found moments” the brothers were looking for. Some viewers, inevitably, felt cheated by this admission. Others were confused. Was the film documentary or fiction? Direct Cinema in the tradition of the Maysles brothers, or a slice of boozy American naturalism à la John Cassavetes? Or was it perhaps something else again, inspired by both but indebted to neither?

I haven’t yet seen Bloody Nose, Empty Pockets, although once I read about the controversy, my interest in it increased rather than diminished. Part of this, admittedly, is down to the quarrelsome relationship I have with a lot of documentaries. Many present urgent truths, only to fail as cinema: they’re banal or didactic, or not well-visualised. Others seem well-intentioned but shallow. And some just tick a box – the ever-expanding canon of Alex Gibney, for example. Each year, briskly, perfunctorily tackling l’outrage du jour with all the insight of a Let’s Go guidebook.

But even when a documentary is successful, I often find myself outside of the film, pondering the questions any supposedly unmediated representation of reality inevitably throws up. Did they prep that location, or those bystanders? How did they capture that audio? Did this happen only once – are we, at any given moment, witnessing an “actual incident” – or was it re-enacted for the camera, and if so, what modifications were made? These are practical matters that hint at broader ethical concerns, about a filmmaker’s relationship with their subject, their duty to the viewer, and their fidelity or otherwise to what’s commonly known as truth.

I thought about this while watching Honeyland, the Oscar-nominated documentary from Macedonian filmmakers Tamara Kotevska and Ljubomir Stefanov, but that’s not to say it’s a failure. Quite the contrary: shot over three years, and assembled from more than 400 hours of raw footage, it’s not only an extraordinary piece of cinema in its own right, a kind of pastoral epic, but one that seems to exist at a curious yet compelling intersection of reportage and fiction.

It tells the story of Hatidže Muratova, a North Macedonian woman of Turkish descent. Now in her mid-fifties, she lives in Bekirlija, an abandoned village lacking electricity or fresh water, with her 85-year-old mother, Nazife – an invalid with a nasty facial wound, a foggy sense of the present, and no apparent inclination to leave the bed she’s occupied for the past four years. Hatidže feeds her, bickers with her, tells her stories. But for a few sleepy cats, the two women are utterly alone. 

Hatidže also tends to bees – she is, in fact, the last female keeper of wild bees in Europe – and maintains a number of hives in various hidden places throughout the landscape, in hollowed-out trees or behind crumbling stone walls. Our first glimpse of Hatidže finds her making her way expertly along the side of a mountain, perilously close to the edge, as she goes to check on yet another of her secret stores.

When it comes to gathering the honey, she operates according to a strict rule: “Half for them, half for me.” She takes enough, in other words, to support herself, but not so much as to destroy the colonies. Every few weeks she travels to the capital, Skopje, to sell that month’s yield and buy supplies, on a journey that seems to transport her from the medieval world into the present day. Then it’s back to the countryside. The cold cottage, the teeming insects. It’s a lonely, hardscrabble existence, made no easier by the precarious nature of the local economy.

And then one day her routine is disturbed by the arrival of a family, Turkish like herself, who claim a neighbouring parcel of land. They’re tinkers, and Hatidže, clearly grateful for some company, at first welcomes and befriends them. The patriarch, Hussein Sam, watches her go about her work. As he asks her about the money she makes selling her honey, we almost see a little light bulb appear over his head. Before long, he’s bought some frames of his own.

Alas, Hussein is not a natural apiarist. He’s both impatient and uncertain – a less-than-ideal combination – and as a result is frequently stung. His ineptitude is bettered only by the lack of interest from his seven young children, whom he attempts to draft into assisting him. One son in particular has nothing but contempt for his father and this latest, half-arsed plan – yet intriguingly, we watch the same boy strike up a close relationship with Hatidže, whose knowledge and skill he clearly respects.

Incompetent and opportunistic Hussein might be, but he’s not a villain – he has, after all, a family to support. That role falls instead to a local merchant, a burly spiv straight out of an Emir Kusturica movie, who sees an opportunity (and a willing mark – he ignores the wiser Hatidže) and drafts purchase terms that Hussein then struggles to meet. In desperation, the newcomer disregards Hatidže’s advice to leave half the bees’ yield, with dire consequences for her own hives.

Kotevska and Stefanov are adamant that there are no fictional devices in their movie – that the story unfolded, more or less, as we see it. I have no reason to doubt them. It’s enough to know (as the film’s “making of” notes reveal) that their original plan – to make a state-sponsored short-form documentary about the shifting course of the Bregalnica River – changed once they apprehended the more compelling narrative, and character, they chanced upon. They were fortunate, certainly. But they also fulfilled the remit of any good documentarian: they saw.

And Hatidže is nothing if not a character. Looking a little like one of van Gogh’s potato eaters, she’s high-spirited and resilient, fond of pop songs and dancing and bad jokes, and prone to occasional, touching flashes of vanity. (“Everybody likes to look nice,” she tells her mother, as she dyes her hair over a bucket. “Even me.”) Her daily life echoes her vocation: she’s the worker bee, we come to realise, and Nazife the immobile queen.

But while the directors refuse to intercede – there’s a great moment when one of Hussein’s kids is kicked by a cow he’s trying to milk; the camera doesn’t flinch – the editing, by Atanas Georgiev, is a different matter. There’s a scene towards the end (I won’t spoil it) whose not-inconsiderable power depends entirely upon some adroit cutting; the incident occurred, sure, but the story has undeniably been shaped. Likewise, a moment when Hatidže confesses to Hussein’s son that, if she’d only had a child, her life might be very different. The two of them are sitting in a cave. She can’t be unaware of the camera at that moment – she must be “performing”, at least to some degree. And while that knowledge doesn’t diminish the sorrowful power of her admission, it does complicate it a little.

Ostensibly about ecological catastrophe, Honeyland seemed to me even more persuasive as a parable of capitalism and the devastation that free markets casually, thoughtlessly inflict on the weakest and most vulnerable workers, and the artisanal traditions that sustain them. Volume is everything; expansion is a given. And if commercial growth should destroy the source of that income… well, what of it? Watching, I was reminded of something Bertrand Russell once noted, about how the staunchest advocates for capitalism always harp on about liberty, yet ultimately that belief boils down to a single proposition: “The fortunate must not be restrained in the exercise of tyranny over the unfortunate.”

As Trump and his gangsters overturn anything remotely resembling an environmental regulation, and our prime minister ignores not only a decade’s worth of data, but the mounting evidence of his own senses, this would seem a lesson worth heeding. Yet Honeyland also satisfies on a purely surface level, thanks in no small part to the work of cinematographers Fejmi Daut and Samir Ljuma. The interior shots of Hatidže’s cottage, steeped in shadows, bear a clear debt to the kindred documentary-fictions of Portugal’s Pedro Costa, while the rugged exteriors are rendered with breathtaking clarity, a harsh beauty that’s never merely lyrical. But no image here is more memorable than that of Hatidže herself – isolated in the vast landscape, vivid in her mustard-coloured shirt and emerald headscarf. Indomitable, unbowed.

Shane Danielsen

Shane Danielsen is a screenwriter and former artistic director of the Edinburgh International Film Festival.


 

The Monthly March 2020 cover
View Edition

From the front page

Image of ‘Bewilderment’

‘Bewilderment’ by Richard Powers

The Pulitzer winner’s open-hearted reworking of Flowers for Algernon, updated for modern times

Image of Prime Minister Scott Morrison and Deputy Prime Minister Barnaby Joyce. Images via ABC News

Morrison’s mandate

Barnaby Joyce acknowledges that a net-zero target is cabinet’s call. But what exactly is their mandate?

Image of ‘Scary Monsters’

‘Scary Monsters’ by Michelle de Kretser

Two satirical stories about fitting in, from the two-time Miles Franklin–winner

Image of Jeremy Strong as Kendall Roy in HBO’s Succession season 3. Photograph by David Russell/HBO

Ties that bind: ‘Succession’ season three

Jeremy Strong’s performance in the HBO drama’s third season is masterful


In This Issue

Image of cow in photo studio

The milk of human genius

The end of the cow is near as animal-free milk is likely to decimate the traditional dairy industry within the decade, and plant-based meat is set to upend the beef market

Image by Douglas Coupland

All watched over

How far away is mass surveillance when Australian governments are linking CCTV cameras to facial-recognition technology and providing photo IDs to a nationwide system known as ‘the Capability’?

Image of Longhouse, Daylesford, Victoria.

Plans never imagined: Architect Timothy Hill

The ‘Longhouse’ and the ‘Multihouse’ confirm the director of Partners Hill as the country’s most important and influential architect of the past 30 years

Image of Use No Hooks, circa 1979

The future was foreclosed: Post-punk and Use No Hooks’ ‘The Job’

Energetic cross-genre experiments power a scant retrospective from members of Melbourne’s ‘little band’ scene


More in Arts & Letters

Photo: “Breakfast at Heide” (from left: Sidney Nolan, Max Harris, Sunday Reed and John Reed), circa 1945

Artful lodgers: The Heide Museum of Modern Art

The story of John and Sunday Reed’s influence on Sidney Nolan and other live-in protégés

Still from ‘The French Dispatch’

The life solipsistic: ‘The French Dispatch’

Wes Anderson’s film about a New Yorker–style magazine is simultaneously trivial and exhausting

Still from ‘Nitram’

An eye on the outlier: ‘Nitram’

Justin Kurzel’s biopic of the Port Arthur killer is a warning on suburban neglect and gun control

Detail from ‘Group IV, The Ten Largest, No. 2, Childhood’ by Hilma af Klint (1907)

A shock of renewal: ‘Hilma af Klint: The Secret Paintings’

The transcendent works of the modernist who regarded herself not an artist but a medium


More in Film

Still from ‘The French Dispatch’

The life solipsistic: ‘The French Dispatch’

Wes Anderson’s film about a New Yorker–style magazine is simultaneously trivial and exhausting

Still from ‘Nitram’

An eye on the outlier: ‘Nitram’

Justin Kurzel’s biopic of the Port Arthur killer is a warning on suburban neglect and gun control

Still from Steven Soderbergh’s ‘No Sudden Move’

True to form: ‘No Sudden Move’

Steven Soderbergh’s Detroit crime movie is another formal experiment with commercial trappings

Image from ‘Shiva Baby’

Forebodings and a funeral: ‘Shiva Baby’

Emma Seligman’s funny but tense film is a triumph of writing and performance over spectacle


Read on

Image of Jeremy Strong as Kendall Roy in HBO’s Succession season 3. Photograph by David Russell/HBO

Ties that bind: ‘Succession’ season three

Jeremy Strong’s performance in the HBO drama’s third season is masterful

Image of a tampon and a sanitary pad viewed from above

A bloody shame: Paid period leave should be law

Australia’s workplace laws must better accommodate the reproductive body

Image of Gladys Berejiklian appearing before an ICAC hearing in October 2020. Image via ABC News

The cult of Gladys Berejiklian

What explains the hero-worship of the former NSW premier?

Cover image of ‘Bodies of Light’

‘Bodies of Light’ by Jennifer Down

The Australian author’s latest novel, dissecting trauma, fails to realise its epic ambitions