March 2016

The Nation Reviewed

Holy flark

By Paul Connolly
The Watson family take on ‘Family Feud’

The set of Channel Ten’s Family Feud has all the subtlety of Las Vegas at night, and as we take our seats within its glow the crowd-warmer fills us in on game-show audience etiquette: in essence, smile no matter what. The studio crew, wearing hospital booties over their shoes to prevent scuffing, all but skate over the polished floor. In the wings, having their microphones and hair adjusted for the last time, are the two competing families: the Britos, on a three-game winning streak, and new challengers the Watsons.

Slim, bespectacled, curly-haired Catherine Catarinich (née Watson), 50, is a long-time fan of Family Feud, and she can’t quite believe she’s here. Her love of the show was one reason why her younger sister, Jo, encouraged the family to audition, which they did months earlier, attempting to appear as fun, quirky and interesting as game-show contestants are expected to be.

Catherine, her twin, Sharon, and Catherine’s 22-year-old son, Mat (who wore Harry Potter robes to the audition), dusted off some anecdotes for the show’s producers. Jo had one about seeing, and following, Madonna in Manhattan in 1996, and buying a jacket the star tried on in a store and rejected. Catherine recounted competing as an 18-year-old in the 100 metres and 400 metres at the 1984 Paralympics in New York. The producers were impressed enough to invite the Watsons onto the show, and pushed back the family’s scheduled appearance to allow the creaking public dental-health service time to fit Catherine with new dentures. The gap between her teeth was not going to look good on TV.

Catherine’s Paralympics tale was a mere side-story in a life impossible to turn into game-show patter. Suffering mild but lasting brain damage and partial blindness after a haemorrhage at birth, Catherine went to a school for the vision impaired until Year 9, by which time she’d started athletics training. At 27, after marrying a man with profound disabilities, she had a son, Mat. He was 11 months old when the couple split, leaving Catherine, with the considerable help of family, to raise him alone in a small public housing unit in Melbourne’s outer east. Mat’s father suicided when Mat was 14, by which time Catherine had been diagnosed with type 2 diabetes and breast cancer. She underwent chemotherapy and a double mastectomy.

Mat, an effervescent young man who speaks as if every sentence ends with an exclamation mark, is now an arts and science student at Monash University. He lives with the ever-resilient Catherine, and is now more carer than cared for.

None of this, of course, is apparent to the audience, who might be inclined to overlook Catherine’s slight, unobtrusive presence in favour of Jo’s bright orange hair or Mat’s traffic-light red pants. In any case, the enthusiastic crowd is soon distracted by the arrival of host Grant Denyer, who is so small, polished and cheerful he looks like an escapee from the Myer Christmas windows. After he greets and charms the audience we’re underway, Denyer taking his position at a central podium flanked by team captains Jo and Gilda. As Jo found out while chatting in the green room, Gilda Brito is one of four sisters whose father came to Australia after fleeing Chile’s Pinochet regime. I can’t help feeling that these families should be on Australian Story, not Family Feud.

“Name something that will take you over snow,” Denyer begins. Jo slaps the buzzer first and gets on the board with “a sled”, but Gilda trumps her with the higher ranked survey answer “skis”. At this point the Britos pass – a common tactic – giving the Watsons the opportunity to guess the remaining answers on the board. The Watsons strike out, allowing the Britos to confer and “steal” the points with “snowboard”.

Answers, we are later told, are usually obvious, though there are outliers. No wonder. During a break we fill in surveys for use in future episodes, and judging by the surrounding laughter, the temptation to be creative is irresistible. How do you resolve a family argument? “With capsicum spray,” I write.

After the Watsons bounce back to win the second round (“Name something most families wish they had”), Catherine gets her opportunity at the buzzer in the third round. “What would you find growing in a field?” Her answer (“wildflowers”) helps the Watsons surge to a 279–76 lead, just 21 points short of victory, with one round remaining. This brings Mat to the podium.

“Name a word that rhymes with ‘mark’.”

Although he misses the buzzer entirely – “Mum’s meant to be blind, not me,” he quips, earning a laugh from Catherine, the most animated she’s been all evening – he redeems himself with “bark”, the top answer, and the Watsons choose to play.

After Denyer prompts her to share her Madonna anecdote, Jo tries “hark”, eliciting the internationally recognised sound effect for failure: bah-bow. But then the Watsons guess four straight. “Park!” says Sharon. “Shark!” (Catherine) “Lark!” (Mat) “Stark!” (Jo) One more will win them the game, and they have two guesses up their sleeve.

Sharon responds. “Cark?” Bah-bow. All the pressure, and attention, is now on Catherine.

After an awkward pause she lifts her head.

“Flark?”

The crowd laughs, and groans. Denyer adopts a look of stunned amusement. “Holy flark, can you use it in a sentence?” Catherine can only grin sheepishly. The game is up. She knows it. Everyone knows it. But the board, like an oracle, must be consulted.

Bah-bow. When the Britos’ answer, “spark”, flashes up on the board, they steal the points and the game. The Watsons are going home.

In the foyer afterwards, mingling with the crowd who never got to hear of her Paralympics adventure, Catherine smiles shyly and tells me she enjoyed the experience.

“I just wish I hadn’t said that at the end,” she says. “But they told us that it’s better to say something – anything – than nothing at all.”

Paul Connolly

Paul Connolly is a Melbourne-based freelance journalist and author, and is the editor of the essay collection Father Figures.

From the front page

Image of fans taking a selfie with a photo of tennis star Novak Djokovic ahead of first round matches at the Australian Open in Melbourne. Image © Hamish Blair / AP Photo

‘Health and good order’

If Novak Djokovic is “a talisman of anti-vaccination sentiment”, what does that make George Christensen?

Image of Kim Philby (left) and Phillip Knightley

On Her Majesty’s secret disservice

The reporter who uncovered the truth about Kim Philby, the 20th century’s most infamous spy, and his warnings for democratic society

Illustration by Jeff Fisher

Echidna poo has changed our understanding of human evolution

Citizen science is not only helping echidna conservation, but changing how we think about evolution

Image of sculpture by Jane Bamford

The artist making sculpture for penguins

How creating sculpture for animals is transforming wildlife conservation and the art world

In This Issue

Germ welfare

Public health and personal responsibility

Grayson Perry’s ‘My Pretty Little Art Career’

Museum of Contemporary Art Australia, Sydney, until 1 May 2016

Illustration

The start-up whisperer

Just how innovative is the Turnbull government’s innovation package?

‘In Other Words’ by Jhumpa Lahiri

Bloomsbury; $29.99


More in The Nation Reviewed

Illustration by Jeff Fisher

Declaration of independents

The success of Indi MP Helen Haines points to more non-aligned voices in parliament

Illustration by Jeff Fisher

Echidna poo has changed our understanding of human evolution

Citizen science is not only helping echidna conservation, but changing how we think about evolution

Illustration by Jeff Fisher

Who runs the mines in Papua?

Foreign mining companies are exiting Papua, amid accusations of Indonesian corruption

Illustration by Jeff Fisher

Lockdown loaves and hampers

The pandemic has led to a surge in people needing help putting food on the table


Online exclusives

Still from ‘The Worst Person in the World’, showing Anders Danielsen Lie as Aksel and Renate Reinsve as Julie. Image courtesy Everett Collection.

‘The Worst Person in the World’

Renate Reinsve is exceptional in Joachim Trier’s satisfying Nordic rom-com

Image of WA Premier Mark McGowan earlier this week announcing the state will reopen its border to the rest of the country on February 5, after almost two years of border closures. Image © Richard Wainwright / AAP Images

Family’s grief compounded by WA’s hard border

The awful predicament of a Melbourne family unable to bring home their son’s body shows the callousness of WA’s border policy

Image of Liliane Amuat and Henriette Confurius in Ramon and Sylvan Zürcher’s film The Girl and the Spider. Image supplied

The best of 2021 on screen

This year may have been difficult to live through, but it produced an extraordinary crop of films

Image of Rob Collins as Tyson in ‘Firebite’. Image supplied

Raising the stakes: ‘Firebite’

Warwick Thornton’s magnificently pulpy Indigenous vampire-hunter drama leads the pack of December streaming highlights