July 2013

The Nation Reviewed

RM Williams and haute couture

By Karen de Perthuis
RM Williams and haute couture
The iconic Australian brand has a new co-owner

For years the iconic Australian bush brand, RM Williams, looked ripe for a fashion makeover. With its signature handcrafted boot leading the way, something along the lines of what Burberry had managed on the back of its trench coat seemed likely. Hardly an original idea, and somewhat redundant given that couturier Jonathan Ward had been the company’s executive designer since 2001. But with the recent sale of 49.9% of the company to L Capital Asia, a private-equity firm backed by the French luxury giant LVMH Group, the transformation of RM Williams into a major fashion label now appears inevitable.

The symbolic value of the sale was far greater than the rumoured $53 million price tag. In the media, it was presented as a ray of hope for a local industry more used to stories of designer labels going into voluntary liquidation, and retail centres turned into ghost towns by online competitors. In fashion circles, LVMH is best known for its stable of couture brands, so there was a sense of pride in predictions that the iconic RM boot would soon be following the likes of Dior, Givenchy and Louis Vuitton down the catwalks of Paris.

But from the first whisperings that owner Ken Cowley was looking for an international investor, the company’s core outback and rural customers were nervous. A “Keep RM Williams Australian” campaign was launched on Facebook, aimed at preventing a “great national icon” being “sold into foreign ownership”. Close on the heels of the RM Williams deal came Ford’s announcement of plans to close facilities at Broadmeadows and Geelong, so concern about a restructured RM Williams taking its production offshore was understandable. Throughout its history, being “wholly Australian-owned” has been integral to the company’s image, with the high quality, authenticity and durability of its products embodying the spirit of the company and the fabric of the nation. At stake were not only Australian jobs but also Australian identity.

Media reporting tended to downplay these fears, repeating the company line that RM Williams would “continue to manufacture quality product in Australia”. Many seemed seduced by the glamour attached to LVMH, invoking the famous initials (which stand for Louis Vuitton – Moët Hennessy) to conjure up a reassuring message of respect for tradition, quality craftsmanship and commitment to local production. The headline in the BRW, for example, announced “Why RM Williams got the right partner in French luxury giant LVMH”. But with so much at stake for the Australian brand, had they? Well, yes. And no.

The knack of LVMH boss Bernard Arnault to turn every-thing he touches to gold has made him the richest man in France and probably the single most powerful presence on the fashion and luxury leather goods scene. A ruthless and unrelenting shopper himself – his commercial acquisitions have been known to leave blood on the floor – he plucked the Christian Dior brand from duty-free purgatory back in the 1980s and made the designer logo chic. With names like Loewe, Fendi, Berluti and Louis Vuitton to protect, Arnault knows the importance of respect for the heritage of local production.

The acquisition of RM Williams, however, was made not by LVMH, but its affiliate L Capital. There is a difference. Whereas LVMH deals in “Fashion and Leather Goods”, L Capital keeps its fashion brands in a sector called “Personal Equipment”. Instead of seeking out luxury and exclusivity, it shops for brands that are “Aspirational, Affordable and Alternative”. Its investment strategy, as outlined on its website, is “Brand Building and Distribution”, achieved through “Value Creation” and, if past records are any indication, this translates to buying brands, building them up and selling them on.

None of this is to suggest that the legendary RM Williams boot, worn by celebrities, politicians, sports stars and drovers alike, is about to go the way of the Ford Falcon. Even at one remove, links to LVMH have to count for something. In the case of RM Williams, the obvious starting point of “Value Creation” for an expanded international market is the company’s “Australianness”, a concept that stirs up yearnings for a mythical outback of dusty plains, poetic stoicism and rugged individuality – even in those who should know better. It’s a myth woven into the legend of the founder of the company, Reginald Murray Williams. Born on a farm in 1908, as a teenager he worked the goldfields and trekked the deserts of Western Australia. When the Great Depression hit, he was reduced to supporting his young family by digging wells until a saddler called Dollar Mick taught him the art of working leather. He sold his first pair of boots to a wealthy pastoralist and went on to build a brand that, by the time of his death in 2003, was sold in more than 900 outlets throughout the world.

But fashion is a notoriously fickle business and myths and legends only get you so far. What makes the RM Williams story relevant, and no doubt what attracted its new co-owners in the first place, has nothing to do with sentimental notions of the brand as an Australian icon. Rather, it has everything to do with the RM Williams boot as a classic – one of those timeless objects that manage to defy fashionable whim. Handcrafted from cowhide, kangaroo, crocodile, emu or ostrich, stitched with waxen thread onto soles constructed with brass screws and forged steel shanks, and at once functional, hard-wearing and elegant, in an era of mass-production, the RM Williams boot has an appeal that is both moral and aesthetic, and will remain resolutely à la mode.

Karen de Perthuis

Karen de Perthuis is a writer and fashion scholar. She teaches fashion and design at the University of Technology, Sydney, and the University of Western Sydney.

There is nowhere quite like The Monthly. We are told that we live in a time of diminished attention spans; a time where the 24-hour-news-cycle has produced a collective desire for hot takes and brief summaries of the news and ideas that effect us. But we don’t believe it. The need for considered, reflective, long-form journalism has never been greater, and for almost 20 years, that’s what The Monthly has offered, from some of our finest writers.

That kind of quality writing costs money, and requires the support of our readers. Your subscription to The Monthly allows us to be the home for the best, most considered, most substantial perspectives on the state of the world. It’s Australia’s only current affairs magazine, an indispensable home for cultural commentary, criticism and reviews, and home to personal and reflective essays that celebrate and elevate our humanity.

The Monthly doesn’t just comment on our culture, our society and our politics: it shapes it. And your subscription makes you part of that.

Select your digital subscription

Month selector

From the front page

Kim Williams seen through window with arms half-raised

The interesting Mr Williams

At a time when the ABC faces more pressure than ever before, is its new chair the right person for the job?

Exterior of the Department of Treasury, Canberra

Tax to grind

Tax reform should not be centred on what we want, but on who we want to be

Rehearsal for the ABC TV show ‘Cooking with Wine’, March 13, 1956

Whose ABC?

Amid questions of relevance and culture war hostilities, the ABC’s charter clearly makes the case for a government-funded national broadcaster

Tony McNamara in New York City, January 2024

Pure things: Tony McNamara

How the Australian screenwriter of ‘Poor Things’, who cut his teeth on shows such as ‘The Secret Life of Us’, earnt his second Oscar nomination

In This Issue

“We’re all conservatives now”

Guy Rundle interviews Julian Assange at the Embassy of Ecuador, London
© John Woudstra / Fairfax Syndication

Inside Tony Abbott’s mind

What would an Abbott government look like?

Alex Gibney’s ‘We Steal Secrets: the Story of WikiLeaks’

This documentary’s sympathies are not with Julian Assange

The Age offices in Collins Street, Melbourne c. 1903. © Fairfax Syndication

The death of Fairfax and the end of newspapers

Where is the journalism we need going to come from now?


More in The Nation Reviewed

Illustration by Jeff Fisher

Letter from Dunkley

As a byelection draws the nation’s focus to the scrappy suburb of the author’s childhood, a visit reveals the damage wrought by the housing crisis

Illustration by Jeff Fisher

Lines in the sand

By failing to take Indigenous knowledge seriously, a scientific paper speculating on the origin of WA desert ‘fairy circles’ misses the mark

Illustration by Jeff Fisher

Serving time (after time)

Australian citizens are being held in supervised facilities after they have served their prison sentence, amounting to indefinite detention

Illustration by Jeff Fisher

Might as well face it

Lively discussions take place around the country every week on ethical non-monogamy, love addiction and how much sex is too much


Online latest

Osamah Sami with members of his local mosque

In ‘House of Gods’, Sydney’s Muslim community gets to be complicated

Plus, Barnaby Joyce shines in ‘Nemesis’, Emma Seligman and Rachel Sennott deliver ‘Bottoms’, and Chloë Sevigny and Molly Ringwald step up for ‘Feud: Capote vs. The Swans’.

International Film Festival Rotterdam highlights

Films from Iran, Ukraine and Bundaberg were deserving winners at this year’s festival

Two women on a train smile and shake hands

‘Expats’ drills down on Hong Kong’s class divide

Plus, Netflix swallows Trent Dalton, Deborah Mailman remains in ‘Total Control’ and ‘Vanderpump Rules’ returns for another season

Image of a man playing music using electronics and the kora (West African harp)

Three overlooked albums of spiritual jazz from 2023

Recent releases by kora player John Haycock, trumpeter Matthew Halsall and 14-piece jazz ensemble Ancient Infinity Orchestra feel like a refuge from reality