July 2013

The Nation Reviewed

Inside Julian Assange’s high-tech lair

By Guy Rundle
Inside Julian Assange’s high-tech lair
An interview with the WikiLeaks Party Senate candidate

Behind Harrods, in the early evening, black cabs come and go outside the handsome red-brick Edwardian block that houses the Ecuadorian embassy. The WikiLeaks Party’s number-one candidate for the Victorian Senate ticket, Julian Assange, can see them from the windows that have given him his only view of the outside world for the past year. Twelve months sealed within a small building has left him looking pale and a little puffy, and multiple legal and political tasks have left him tired, but the WikiLeaks hub in London’s “Little Quito” is buzzing.

“This is our TV studio,” Assange says, ushering me into a room jumbled with cameras, microphones and cable-festooned laptops. “We built it from scratch.”

Both the organisation and its leader are fighting on various fronts: from battling an Interpol red notice and potential US indictments, and supporting the growing number of cyber dissidents, to getting back to its core business of leaking. Then there’s the Australian election. A vague hope that Assange might be able to campaign in person has recently been dashed. One of the two Swedish women accusing him of sex crimes appears to have redoubled her determination to pursue the case, hiring lawyer Elisabeth Massi Fritz, a specialist in “honour” killings and the Swedish prime minister’s family lawyer.

Nonetheless, Assange maintains that his run for the Senate is about more than drawing the next Australian government into a three-way extradition tussle.

“No, we announced this [political push] in early 2012 before I came into the embassy,” he says, settling into a Chesterfield armchair, in a corner of the studio. “At that time we were concerned that the battle between the two major parties in the Australian election would suck out all the oxygen for all the issues that we hold dear, such as freedom on the internet, protection of journalists and whistleblowers, and of course the protection of WikiLeaks as an Australian organisation itself.”

Assange has long thought that a shift into the mainstream political sphere would be necessary for the dissident movement that has arisen globally via the internet, though not that he would be the one making it. “But, in 2010, as a result of the conflicts WikiLeaks was involved in, people said that whether I liked it or not, I had become a political figure, and I should make proper use of that position. I considered approaching the Greens, because I agree with some of what they say, and [WA Senator] Scott Ludlam in particular has been an extraordinarily solid supporter, but the Greens, because of their size, have become a bureaucratic party, and we’d fight to get all our issues prioritised. We also didn’t want to be involved in the possibility of a vicious preselection.”

With polling indicating significant “potential” public support, Assange is gearing up for a full campaign to be waged from the eight rooms of the embassy. The TV studio is part of that effort, a fully functioning global media base that he and a couple of WikiLeaks staffers have put together. With its mix of off-the-shelf and homebrew tech, and a viridian-coloured cloth on the back wall used as a screen, it has everything anyone from CNN to community television stations needs to patch in for an interview, at a fraction of standard costs. By solving harried news editors’ problems for them – no crew to be dispatched, no last-minute lost links – Assange has gained an inside track in terms of coverage by mainstream media.

It’s nine at night, and there are still a couple of vaguely punky, Occupy-ish types around, contrasting with the embassy’s boardroom tables and chairs, and whitewashed hacienda-style interior. Tapping away on laptops, they’re communicating with the further reaches of the organisation via encrypted software. The whole outfit runs on hacker-tech savvy – the very least that is needed, Assange believes, to go up against a monolith of state and tech-corporate power. In a recent article for the New York Times, titled ‘The Banality of “Don’t Be Evil”’, he’d assailed the self-satisfied delusions of tech tycoons now thoroughly enmeshed with hard power. Assange picks up the thread.

“So, Eric Schmidt, the CEO of Google, has stated that as Lockheed Martin was to the 20th century, so high-tech companies will be to the 21st century. And on the back cover of Schmidt’s new book, The New Digital Age, there are endorsements from Henry Kissinger, Madeleine Albright, Tony Blair and Bill Clinton. Politically, it is an attempt by Google to align itself with Washington power.

“Google evolved out of California grad-student culture, a quite humane, harmless if somewhat privileged culture, so how did this come to be? My take on it is that as Google encountered the world and tried to get into India and China, it needed an organisation that understood that, and that was the [US] state department,” he says. “There’s been a general blurring of everything so where you would once have ... the state sector versus the market ... that’s gone now.”

The “global democracy” movement that emerged in part out of 1990s hacker networks has focused on this convergence for some time. Now, with the revelation of the National Security Agency’s PRISM global mega-surveillance program, the world has become suddenly concentrated on it. But given these and other convergences of power, why has resistance been so partial and fragmentary?

“Broadly, as a result of the internet merging with society and society merging with the internet … a new body politic is being constructed, and it’s just working out what its values are,” Assange tells me, adding that the Occupy protests were part of the process, a sort of collective cry of “What’s going on?”

“I think [the Occupy movement] is basically a conservative movement but, well, we’re all conservatives now. We’re just trying to hang on to the rights we’ve got. That said, let’s not be naive about the efforts that were used to destroy the Occupy movement, to prevent it transforming into an effective political force.”

There’s a lot of that about. From the start of Bradley Manning’s trial, currently in its second month, it became clear that the US government’s main target was Assange, whom they hope to prosecute under the catch-all US Espionage Act of 1917. So how is he bearing up?

“I’m used to it; that’s my life. As for Bradley Manning, he faces a very serious situation but … he’s a bright guy. It appears he’s not the type to fall apart. If you’re involved in any serious dramatic event, the time to worry about it is after, not during.”

A young woman in a headscarf, laptop under her arm, comes in to remind Assange that he has a call from New York in two minutes’ time. Outside, with my passport and phone returned by the inscrutable Ecuadorian door staff, I look at the cafe across the street, bustling with Harrods kids, Arabs and assorted Eurotrash, drinking £5 espressos. The whole area is being rebuilt with Qatari money, glass towers going up among the Victoriana. The place feels like a giant circuit board, components being pulled up and resoldered, but the whole world feels that way at the moment. On the other side of it, in a Hong Kong hotel room, Edward Snowden is leaking the workings of the NSA’s all-enveloping surveillance of our daily lives. These are strange times, strange enough to accommodate Senator Assange with ease.

Read the full-length interview with Julian Assange here.

Guy Rundle
Guy Rundle is the global correspondent-at-large for Crikey. He is the author of Down to the Crossroads: On the Trail of the 2008 US Presidential Election and two Quarterly Essays, ‘The Opportunist’ and ‘Bipolar Nation’.

There is nowhere quite like The Monthly. We are told that we live in a time of diminished attention spans; a time where the 24-hour-news-cycle has produced a collective desire for hot takes and brief summaries of the news and ideas that effect us. But we don’t believe it. The need for considered, reflective, long-form journalism has never been greater, and for almost 20 years, that’s what The Monthly has offered, from some of our finest writers.

That kind of quality writing costs money, and requires the support of our readers. Your subscription to The Monthly allows us to be the home for the best, most considered, most substantial perspectives on the state of the world. It’s Australia’s only current affairs magazine, an indispensable home for cultural commentary, criticism and reviews, and home to personal and reflective essays that celebrate and elevate our humanity.

The Monthly doesn’t just comment on our culture, our society and our politics: it shapes it. And your subscription makes you part of that.

Select your digital subscription

Month selector

From the front page

Kim Williams seen through window with arms half-raised

The interesting Mr Williams

At a time when the ABC faces more pressure than ever before, is its new chair the right person for the job?

Exterior of the Department of Treasury, Canberra

Tax to grind

Tax reform should not be centred on what we want, but on who we want to be

Rehearsal for the ABC TV show ‘Cooking with Wine’, March 13, 1956

Whose ABC?

Amid questions of relevance and culture war hostilities, the ABC’s charter clearly makes the case for a government-funded national broadcaster

Tony McNamara in New York City, January 2024

Pure things: Tony McNamara

How the Australian screenwriter of ‘Poor Things’, who cut his teeth on shows such as ‘The Secret Life of Us’, earnt his second Oscar nomination

In This Issue

“We’re all conservatives now”

Guy Rundle interviews Julian Assange at the Embassy of Ecuador, London

RM Williams and haute couture

The iconic Australian brand has a new co-owner

Al Grassby and the Rolling Stones

A Blue Whale and Whaling Men, by Frank Hurley, National Library of Australia

John Newton’s ‘A Savage History: Whaling in the Pacific and Southern Oceans’

An account of commercial whaling’s ignoble past

More in The Nation Reviewed

Illustration by Jeff Fisher

Letter from Dunkley

As a byelection draws the nation’s focus to the scrappy suburb of the author’s childhood, a visit reveals the damage wrought by the housing crisis

Illustration by Jeff Fisher

Lines in the sand

By failing to take Indigenous knowledge seriously, a scientific paper speculating on the origin of WA desert ‘fairy circles’ misses the mark

Illustration by Jeff Fisher

Serving time (after time)

Australian citizens are being held in supervised facilities after they have served their prison sentence, amounting to indefinite detention

Illustration by Jeff Fisher

Might as well face it

Lively discussions take place around the country every week on ethical non-monogamy, love addiction and how much sex is too much

Online latest

Osamah Sami with members of his local mosque

In ‘House of Gods’, Sydney’s Muslim community gets to be complicated

Plus, Barnaby Joyce shines in ‘Nemesis’, Emma Seligman and Rachel Sennott deliver ‘Bottoms’, and Chloë Sevigny and Molly Ringwald step up for ‘Feud: Capote vs. The Swans’.

International Film Festival Rotterdam highlights

Films from Iran, Ukraine and Bundaberg were deserving winners at this year’s festival

Two women on a train smile and shake hands

‘Expats’ drills down on Hong Kong’s class divide

Plus, Netflix swallows Trent Dalton, Deborah Mailman remains in ‘Total Control’ and ‘Vanderpump Rules’ returns for another season

Image of a man playing music using electronics and the kora (West African harp)

Three overlooked albums of spiritual jazz from 2023

Recent releases by kora player John Haycock, trumpeter Matthew Halsall and 14-piece jazz ensemble Ancient Infinity Orchestra feel like a refuge from reality