The view from Billinudgel

Climate of blame
Labor runs the risk of putting expediency over principle

Shadow Minister for Agriculture and Resources Joel Fitzgibbon and Opposition Leader Anthony Albanese. © Mick Tsikas / AAP Image

As Labor sweats on the results of the long-drawn-out post-mortem of its loss in the unlosable election, the warlords are already staking out their own positions.

The feeling seems to be that, since a protracted series of blame games is inevitable, at least they can make a pretence of moving forward, even though they are in fact moving backwards.

And nowhere is the retreat more dispiriting than the demand that the party of progress should abandon its long-term targets on climate change and succumb, yet again, to the government’s manifestly inadequate agenda.

Such Right-faction luminaries as Joel Fitzgibbon and Richard Marles are now suggesting that, in order to help things along in Queensland and Western Australia, the party needs to be more pragmatic on issues such as coal and climate change, with Fitzgibbon advocating for a capitulation to Coalition policy on climate. Their rationale appears to be that the Labor votes were down in these states, and since the two are traditionally designated as the mining states, forgetting about emissions would bring the punters flocking back to the fold.

The logic is patently absurd – while Labor mishandled the Adani issue, and Bob Brown’s quixotic caravan of protest did not help, the real problems in Queensland were Clive Palmer, Pauline Hanson and the monopolised Murdoch media, none of whom would have moved a nanometre if Labor’s target for reduction was 45 per cent, 28 per cent or zero.

But, hey, you have to blame something. So the so-called policy relies essentially on self-preservation – a mixture of timidity and perversity.

If Labor were to implement the Coalition’s climate policy, it is not clear how it would play out, but the lessons from history are not promising: it is only a little over 10 years ago that Kevin Rudd walked away from what he once called the great moral challenge of our times and put his own ambitious plans for climate change on the backburner.

Dumping what was seen as a core belief – a principal point of difference between Labor and the Coalition – caused a slump in his government’s support. The resulting polls, both public and private, provided the excuse the recalcitrant faction bosses needed to replace him, leading to all the instability and vendettas that followed.

The heavies of Sussex Street and beyond were not interested in climate change – their idea of a moral challenge is grabbing the last dim sum from a long lunch in Chinatown. But the rank and file, and the swinging voters, saw Rudd’s defection from the cause as a betrayal, not only because most of them believed in it, but because it showed that when the pressure was put on him, he was just another political opportunist – one who preferred expediency to principle.

And this is precisely the risk Albanese is already accused of running – that he stands for nothing, that he is driven by the polls and the focus groups, and thus is not worth supporting. He has got away with caution and moderation to date, but climate change is the big one, and it will become more urgent as the extreme weather and the passionate politics become more intense.

If self-preservation is really involved, he needs, this time, to hold firm. It may be a long way to the next election, but tapping the mat on this one could be irreparable.

Mungo MacCallum

Mungo MacCallum is a political journalist and commentator. His books include Run Johnny Run, Poll Dancing, and Punch and Judy. Visit his blog, The View from Billinudgel.

Read on

Image of Stephen Bram’s work, Untitled, 2019, acrylic on canvas, 210 x 390 cm.

Currents of joy: Stephen Bram and John Nixon

Overlapping exhibitions by the two abstract artists convey their shared radical modernism

What elitism looks like

Flagrant conflicts of interest abound at the top

Image of Anne Ferran, Scenes on the Death of Nature I, 1986

‘Know My Name’ at the National Gallery of Australia

An exhilarating exhibition considers a persistent gender bias in the visual arts

Image of Prime Minister Scott Morrison

Morrison’s climate flip

Australia has a lot of catching up to do on emissions reduction