Taxing questions
The Duncan Storrar pile-on reveals double standards at work in the media

The gang at News Corp couldn’t believe their luck.

When the hapless Duncan Storrar rose to ask why rich people were to receive tax cuts while the poor, like himself, did not, the man ticked all the boxes.

He was obviously a victim, and presumably a whinger. And he was not only an invited guest of the one-eyed leftist ABC, but of its most unholy program of all – Q&A. And, unsurprisingly, its gullible audience proclaimed him a hero. The man was born to be destroyed.

So the armies of the night gathered to scrabble decades back into his past to find reasons for his persecution. And of course they found some: the man, like so many of the underprivileged, was occasionally involved in drugs and violence; enough said. He could now be dispatched to the ranks of the doomed and damned.

But in a sense this was overkill, because before the gutter-trawling even took place, the man was condemned as a worthless human being: he paid no net tax.

This did not mean that he paid no tax at all; in fact Storrar worked, when he could, on whatever jobs his disability would allow and he received the minimum wage for doing so. Thus he exceeded his tax-free threshold.

But, and this was the point, he collected more benefits than he paid tax, hence he was not a lifter but a leaner, a bludger. He was thus to be despised and rejected.

But this assessment only revealed the curious unreality of the world of News Corp. For many years, its troops have been inveighing against paying tax in any form at all. Tax minimization was the corporation’s core policy; minimization was not only a right but a civic duty.

Their real hero was the late Kerry Packer, who declared to a senate committee:

Of course I’m minimizing my tax. If anyone in this country doesn’t minimize their tax they want their head read. As a government I can tell you that you’re not spending it that well that we should be paying extra.

Packer had a far more worthwhile use for public money: blowing a few million on casinos, for instance.

And he had plenty of incentive to do so, because the government assists tax avoidance for the rich in so many ways. Offshore havens, family trusts, income splitting, dividend imputation, superannuation concessions, negative gearing, capital gains tax deductions, charitable donations – not forgetting party political ones – and all the lurks and perks lawyers and accountants can muster to claim business expenses – including of course the fees of their providers.

The News Corp brigade accepts and applauds this system when it is for the rich, invariably described as “hard-working Australians” – even great ones, like Kerry Packer. But for the strugglers like Duncan Storrar, the dementors have nothing but contempt .

A double standard? Perhaps not. After all, Rupert Murdoch is even richer than Packer was, and he probably pays even less tax. And when he whinges about it (which he does – constantly) he goes straight to the prime minister.

And News Corp, of course, declares him a hero. The righteousness of taxpaying, it seems, like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder – or at least of the employee.

Mungo MacCallum

Mungo MacCallum is a political journalist and commentator. His books include Run Johnny Run, Poll Dancing, and Punch and Judy. Visit his blog, The View from Billinudgel.

Read on

Image from ‘Her Smell’

Toronto International Film Festival 2018 (part two)

The ordinary and the extraordinary at this year’s event, and the perils of criticism

Image from ‘The Harp in the South’

‘The Harp in the South’ at Sydney Theatre Company

Kate Mulvany’s adaptation proves that Ruth Park’s epic endures

Feeding the Muppets

What does the Morrison government have to offer in terms of serious policy?

Paul Feig’s sophisticated ‘A Simple Favour’

This camp study of sociopathy is far from simple


×
×